Required section · Section 2 of 6
Sort the Concern Without Diagnosing It
Unprofessional conduct can include humiliation, exclusion, disrespect, or poor feedback. A personality conflict or disagreement alone is not federal EEO harassment unless it is connected to a protected characteristic. That does not make the conduct acceptable or mean it should be ignored; local policy may provide a management or professional-conduct route for it. That distinction also guides which approved route to use: current organizational policy and applicable law, not an exhaustive list, determine the protected characteristics and procedures that apply.
A harassment concern may involve conduct based on a protected characteristic that changes employment conditions or is severe or frequent enough that a reasonable person would find the environment abusive. Quid pro quo describes an employment decision tied to accepting or rejecting unwelcome conduct. Hostile environment and quid pro quo are analytical categories, and the same facts may raise both. A laboratory worker records and reports facts rather than deciding which category applies.
Retaliation is a separate concern. It can follow a good-faith report, participation in an investigation, providing witness information, or opposition to discrimination. A materially adverse action can be more than formal discipline and may include a changed schedule, duties, or workload that could deter a reasonable person from reporting. The underlying complaint need not ultimately be found unlawful for good-faith participation to be protected.
Separate the observed conduct from the legal conclusion, then route the concern through the approved channel.
| Observed pattern | What it may indicate | Initial route |
|---|---|---|
| Humiliating feedback unrelated to protected status | Unprofessional conduct | Manager or local conduct policy |
| Comment tied to national origin | Potential protected-status harassment | HR, compliance, EEO, or approved channel |
| Schedule change after report or witness statement | Potential retaliation | Approved reporting channel |
| Threat of physical harm | Active safety threat | Security or emergency procedure |
Use this triage sequence before deciding whom to contact.
Check immediate danger
If there is an active threat or imminent physical harm, use security or emergency services under local procedure.
Identify observable facts
Record what was said or done, when, who was present, and the work impact.
Match the concern
Consider whether facts suggest professional-conduct, protected-status, accommodation, retaliation, or safety pathways.
Report or escalate
Use an approved channel and let the designated process assess the concern.
Knowledge checks
Reading and checks are open. Sign in only to save.
Knowledge check 1
Knowledge check 2
Section status
Finish this section
Reading and checks are open. Sign in only to save.
The module finishes after every required section is marked done and every check in those sections is correct.