Required section · Section 4 of 6
Guided case: evidence for a potassium bench assessment
A medical laboratory scientist six weeks into independent work on a core chemistry analyzer. The potassium test system uses an ion-selective electrode method. The employee is due for the first-year semiannual competency assessment. The local laboratory policy defines its assessor delegation and critical-value procedure.
During direct observation, the employee verifies specimen identification, centrifugation, analyzer loading, and release for two patient specimens. The assessor reviews documentation that a potassium result of 5.9 mmol/L was flagged high and the required critical-value callback was logged with time, recipient, and read-back confirmation. These observations support routine testing and monitoring, recording, and reporting elements.
The QC log contains two control levels for the prior 30 days. One flag was resolved by a documented recalibration and return to range. At 16:00, a low potassium control of 3.18 mmol/L falls outside the 3.3 to 3.7 mmol/L interval. In the challenge scenario, the employee must state what stops, what records are reviewed, and who is notified before testing resumes.
At the bench, score the employee's response to the failed-control decision separately from the completed routine task.
Illustrative drawing — this picture was drawn rather than captured.
| Component | Case detail | Assessment implication |
|---|---|---|
| Method | Ion-selective electrode | Name the test system |
| Reference interval | 3.5-5.1 mmol/L | 5.9 mmol/L is high |
| Low QC target | 3.5 mmol/L | Monitor control performance |
| Blind sample | Expected 6.8 mmol/L; reported 6.7 mmol/L | Reported 6.7 mmol/L against expected 6.8 mmol/L |
Knowledge checks
Reading and checks are open. Sign in only to save.
Knowledge check 1
Section status
Finish this section
Reading and checks are open. Sign in only to save.
The module finishes after every required section is marked done and every check in those sections is correct.