Module overview
Section 3 of 6 · Open sections

Required section · Section 3 of 6

Dysplasia, Mimics, and Classification Boundaries

Dyserythropoiesis may include abnormal nuclear maturation, budding, irregular contours, multinuclearity, and megaloblastoid change (erythroid precursors with delayed nuclear maturation and relatively mature cytoplasm). Dysgranulopoiesis may include hypogranulation and hypolobation such as pseudo-Pelger forms (neutrophils with an abnormally bilobed or unsegmented nucleus). The term micromegakaryocytes means abnormally small megakaryocytes; a micromegakaryocyte is one such cell; separated megakaryocyte lobes are nuclear lobes with little or no connecting chromatin. These features support dysmegakaryopoiesis only when assessed as a reproducible lineage pattern. Ring sideroblasts are erythroid precursors with iron-laden mitochondria forming a perinuclear ring on an iron stain. Auer rods are needle-like azurophilic cytoplasmic inclusions in blasts and materially affect blast-category assessment.

Before final interpretation, consider vitamin B12 or folate deficiency, copper deficiency, zinc excess, alcohol, drugs, toxins, infection, autoimmune disease, and inherited marrow disorders. Copper deficiency can cause anemia or neutropenia with vacuolated precursors, dysplasia, and ring sideroblasts. Correctable causes must be documented and addressed before a morphology pattern is used to classify a myeloid neoplasm.

WHO-HAEM5 calls the disease family myelodysplastic neoplasm, while ICC retains myelodysplastic syndrome in entity names. WHO groups MDS into defining-genetic-abnormality and morphologically defined entities and no longer uses single versus multilineage dysplasia as a subtype distinction. Both systems require a controlled classification procedure and qualified hematopathology review; the worksheet records observed findings and does not assign a subtype.

Illustrative drawing — this picture was drawn rather than captured.

Text matrix labeling normal erythroid, granulocytic, and megakaryocytic comparators beside their dysplastic counterparts: megaloblastoid change, pseudo-Pelger cells, and micromegakaryocytes.
Figure 1Normal-versus-dysplastic morphology term comparison across erythroid, granulocytic, and megakaryocytic lineages.

Illustrative drawing — this picture was drawn rather than captured.

Workflow comparing an observed cytopenia and dysplasia pattern with nutritional, exposure, systemic, and inherited mimics before marrow and ancillary evidence are considered.
Figure 2Mimic screen before an MDS interpretation is finalized.

Knowledge checks

Reading and checks are open. Sign in only to save.

Knowledge check 1

Select morphology findings that can support dysplasia when assessed in an adequate representative marrow.

Choose at least 3 options.

Knowledge check 2

Which contexts are reasonable MDS mimics to address before final interpretation?

Choose at least 3 options.

Section status

Finish this section

Reading and checks are open. Sign in only to save.

The module finishes after every required section is marked done and every check in those sections is correct.