Skip to content

Add your earlier progress to your account?

From before you signed in, this browser has:

Which plan do you want to keep?

You answered the plan questions before signing in. These answers differ from the plan saved on your account.

SettingSaved planNew answers

Study progress is waiting to be saved

Core Chemistry Calculations

About 5 min · 5 sections · 3 self-checks

On this page

Before calculating, check that the measured values use compatible units, and keep calculated results labeled apart from measured ones. Keep full precision through the calculation, then round according to the reporting precision specified by the laboratory or question.

Iron capacity and saturation

Total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) can be calculated from serum iron and unsaturated iron-binding capacity (UIBC) or derived from a transferrin measurement. In Mayo Clinic Laboratories' current SFEC procedure (test ID SFEC, Iron and Total Iron-Binding Capacity, Serum), transferrin is measured turbidimetrically with Roche TRSF2 reagent and TIBC is calculated as transferrin multiplied by 1.18. Use 1.18 only when the validated procedure specifies this laboratory-specific calculation. The catalog does not establish 1.18 as a factor for every Roche TRSF2 application. The theoretical binding relationship is approximately 1.40 to 1.41 µg/dL TIBC per mg/dL transferrin.1,2

TIBC (µg/dL) = transferrin (mg/dL) × validated factor

The factor has units of µg iron per mg transferrin. Convert transferrin from g/L to mg/dL by multiplying by 100 before using this equation: 3.00 g/L becomes 300 mg/dL.

For a transferrin result of 300 mg/dL:

Factor basis Factor Calculated TIBC
Mayo SFEC procedure with Roche TRSF2 reagent 1.18 354 µg/dL
Approximate theoretical binding relationship 1.41 423 µg/dL

Use the factor specified in the validated procedure. Trace Elements covers iron physiology and interpretation.

TIBC and serum iron must come from the same specimen and use the same concentration units for these calculations:

TIBC = serum iron + UIBC

UIBC = TIBC − serum iron

transferrin saturation (%) = (serum iron ÷ TIBC) × 100

For serum iron of 30 µg/dL and TIBC of 480 µg/dL:

UIBC = 480 − 30 = 450 µg/dL

transferrin saturation = (30 ÷ 480) × 100 = 6.25%, reported as 6.3%

Check yourself 1 of 3

Serum iron is 60 µg/dL and TIBC is 300 µg/dL in the same specimen. What is transferrin saturation?

Incorrect. Dividing TIBC by iron gives 5, the inverse of the required fraction. Saturation uses iron ÷ TIBC × 100.

Correct. The occupied fraction is 60 ÷ 300 = 0.20. Multiplying by 100 gives 20%.

Incorrect. 300 − 60 = 240 µg/dL is the calculated UIBC. UIBC is expressed as a concentration. Saturation requires the iron-to-TIBC ratio multiplied by 100.

Check yourself 2 of 3

A procedure calculates TIBC by multiplying transferrin in mg/dL by 1.18. If serum transferrin is 300 mg/dL, what TIBC does the procedure give?

Incorrect. Dividing 300 by 1.18 gives about 254. The stated procedure requires multiplication.

Incorrect. 423 uses the theoretical factor 1.41. This question explicitly supplies the procedure’s factor of 1.18.

Correct. 300 × 1.18 = 354 µg/dL.

Bilirubin fractionation

Use total bilirubin and the method-defined direct-reacting result from the same specimen and in the same units. Heme Synthesis, Porphyrias, and Bilirubin covers the fraction definitions, method limits, and interpretation.3

calculated indirect bilirubin = total bilirubin − direct bilirubin

With total bilirubin of 10.8 mg/dL and direct bilirubin of 2.4 mg/dL:

calculated indirect bilirubin = 10.8 − 2.4 = 8.4 mg/dL

Friedewald LDL and non-HDL cholesterol

The Friedewald equation estimates very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) from triglycerides, then subtracts that estimate and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) from total cholesterol. The divisor depends on the unit system.4

Unit system Friedewald LDL-C equation Triglycerides must be
mg/dL total cholesterol − HDL-C − (triglycerides ÷ 5) below 400 mg/dL
mmol/L total cholesterol − HDL-C − (triglycerides ÷ 2.2) below 4.5 mmol/L

The original equation used fasting specimens. Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Dyslipidemia covers current estimator selection, method limits, and interpretation.4,5

For either a fasting or nonfasting profile, non-HDL cholesterol requires only total cholesterol and HDL-C in matching units:5

non-HDL-C = total cholesterol − HDL-C

Suppose a fasting panel has total cholesterol 218 mg/dL, triglycerides 160 mg/dL, and HDL-C 50 mg/dL.

estimated VLDL-C = 160 ÷ 5 = 32 mg/dL

Friedewald LDL-C = 218 − 50 − 32 = 136 mg/dL

non-HDL-C = 218 − 50 = 168 mg/dL

Albumin/globulin ratio

Use total protein and albumin from the same specimen and express both in the same concentration units. Plasma Proteins and Electrophoresis covers the measurement methods and interpretation.6

calculated globulin = total protein − albumin

albumin/globulin ratio = albumin ÷ calculated globulin

Because the concentration units cancel, the ratio has no unit.

A zero calculated globulin makes the ratio undefined. A negative calculated globulin means the measured albumin exceeds total protein. Check the component results, units, and method interference before reporting an albumin/globulin ratio.

Suppose total protein is 7.5 g/dL and albumin is 4.2 g/dL.

calculated globulin = 7.5 − 4.2 = 3.3 g/dL

albumin/globulin ratio = 4.2 ÷ 3.3 = 1.2727, reported as 1.27

Use unrounded component values when they are available, then apply the laboratory's display convention.

Check yourself 3 of 3

Total protein is 7.0 g/dL and albumin is 4.0 g/dL in the same specimen. What is the albumin/globulin ratio, rounded to two decimal places?

Incorrect. 4.0 ÷ 7.0 divides albumin by total protein. First subtract albumin to obtain globulin.

Correct. Globulin is 7.0 − 4.0 = 3.0 g/dL. The ratio is 4.0 ÷ 3.0 = 1.33, with no unit.

Incorrect. 3.0 g/dL is the calculated globulin concentration. Divide albumin by that value to obtain the ratio.

Absorbance and percent transmittance

The Beer-Lambert law relates absorbance to concentration and optical path length. With specific absorptivity a, path length b, and concentration c:

A = a × b × c

Absorbance A is dimensionless. When a is expressed in L·mg−1·cm−1, b is in centimeters, and c is in mg/L, their units cancel. Molar absorption uses A = εbc, with molar absorption coefficient ε and molar concentration.6,7

Fractional transmittance T is the ratio of transmitted light to incident light. Multiply T by 100 to obtain percent transmittance:

%T = 100 × T

A = −log10(T) = 2.00 − log10(%T)

T = 10−A

%T = 10(2.00 − A)

In the logarithmic equation, %T is the numerical percentage greater than 0 and up to 100. The Beer-Lambert relationship applies under the wavelength, path-length, sample, and concentration conditions established by the method. Quantitative Instrument Measurement Principles covers calibration and departures from linear response.6,7

Suppose a solution has a specific absorptivity of 0.0120 L·mg−1·cm−1, a path length of 1.00 cm, and a concentration of 25.0 mg/L.

A = 0.0120 × 1.00 × 25.0 = 0.300

%T = 10(2.00 − 0.300) = 50.1%

References
  1. Mayo Clinic Laboratories. Iron and Total Iron-Binding Capacity, Serum. Accessed September 7, 2026. Back to text
  2. Yamanishi H, Iyama S, Yamaguchi Y, Kanakura Y, Iwatani Y. Total iron-binding capacity calculated from serum transferrin concentration or serum iron concentration and unsaturated iron-binding capacity. Clin Chem. 2003;49(1):175-178. doi:10.1373/49.1.175 Back to text
  3. Mayo Clinic Laboratories. Bilirubin, Direct, Serum. Accessed August 31, 2026. Back to text
  4. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18(6):499-502. doi:10.1093/clinchem/18.6.499 Back to text
  5. Blumenthal RS, Morris PB, Gaudino M, et al. 2026 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of dyslipidemia: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2026;153:e1154-e1276. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001423 Back to text
  6. Bishop ML, Fody EP, Van Siclen C, Mistler JM, Moy M. Clinical Chemistry: Principles, Techniques, and Correlations. 9th ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2023. Back to text
  7. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. Beer–Lambert law. In: Compendium of Chemical Terminology. 5th ed. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry; 2025. Online version 5.0.0. Accessed August 31, 2026. doi:10.1351/goldbook.B00626 Back to text

End of Core Chemistry Calculations

Back to top ↑

Saved lessonsReview and reuse

Enlarged figure