Skip to content

Add your earlier progress to your account?

From before you signed in, this browser has:

Which plan do you want to keep?

You answered the plan questions before signing in. These answers differ from the plan saved on your account.

SettingSaved planNew answers

Study progress is waiting to be saved

Blood BankingLesson 13 of 17

Leukocyte and Platelet Antigen Testing

  • 13 min
  • 7 sections
  • 3 self-checks
On this page

Poor platelet increments, neonatal cytopenia, and a suspected antibody-mediated transfusion reaction can each involve a different antigen system: HLA, human neutrophil antigen (HNA), or human platelet antigen (HPA). The clinical pattern determines the specimen, antibody assay, and antigen typing the investigation requires and the component-selection decision that follows. A reactive result is interpretable only when the report names the target antigen or antibody and the method.1

Investigation map

Clinical pattern Initial evidence Focused testing Result used by the transfusion service
Repeated poor platelet increments Timed pretransfusion and posttransfusion platelet counts, platelet dose, body surface area, and clinical factors HLA class I antibody, HPA antibody, patient HLA type, and platelet crossmatch as indicated Crossmatch-compatible, HLA-matched, HLA-compatible, or HPA antigen-negative platelets
Suspected maternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia Maternal and neonatal history, platelet counts, and exclusion of more common causes Maternal platelet antibody testing, HPA genotyping of the mother and neonate or father, and paternal platelet crossmatch Identification of an HPA incompatibility and selection of antigen-negative platelets when needed
Suspected alloimmune neonatal neutropenia Neonatal neutrophil counts, maternal history, and clinical findings Maternal granulocyte antibody testing with HNA phenotyping or genotyping of family members as indicated Definition of an HNA incompatibility and a report for clinical and future-pregnancy planning
Suspected antibody-mediated transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) mechanism The clinical transfusion-reaction investigation and implicated donors and components HLA class I, HLA class II, and HNA antibody testing, followed by cognate antigen testing when useful Mechanistic support and information for donor management under the applicable procedure
Suspected posttransfusion purpura Timing, platelet-count change, transfusion and pregnancy history, and exclusion of other causes HPA antibody identification and patient HPA genotype Confirmation of an alloimmune pattern and planning for future transfusion support

The blood-group systems lesson explains human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and human platelet antigen (HPA) inheritance and nomenclature.

HLA methods in transfusion testing

Platelets carry HLA class I antigens. Antibody to HLA class I is the most common immune cause of platelet transfusion refractoriness. HLA typing and antibody identification can therefore support platelet selection even when the patient is not being evaluated for a transplant.1,2

Complement-dependent cytotoxicity

Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), also called microlymphocytotoxicity, demonstrates complement-mediated injury to viable lymphocytes. Test lymphocytes are incubated with antibody of known specificity for typing, or with patient serum for a crossmatch. Complement is added, and a vital dye distinguishes cells with damaged membranes from cells that exclude the dye. Positive and negative controls establish complement activity, cell viability, and the valid scoring range. The laboratory assigns the HLA type or crossmatch result from the complete reaction pattern across all wells.1,2

CDC depends on viable cells and complement-fixing antibody. A wash step in an Amos-modified method can reduce interference from anticomplementary serum factors, and an AHG-augmented method can increase detection of weak cell-bound antibody. Reagent choice and scoring follow the laboratory's validated procedure. DNA-based methods now provide the primary HLA type in most settings. CDC remains useful for selected antibody and crossmatch questions.1,2

Molecular typing and antibody assays

PCR with sequence-specific primers, sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes, Sanger sequencing, and next-generation sequencing identify HLA alleles at different levels of resolution. The report must state the loci, resolution, ambiguity, and assay coverage. A genotyping result predicts the encoded HLA type only. Antibody detection requires a separate assay.2,3

Cell-based flow cytometry and solid-phase assays detect antibody without requiring complement-mediated cell death. In a single-antigen bead assay, each coded bead carries one HLA antigen, and a fluorescent anti-human immunoglobulin detects bound antibody. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) is an assay signal and does not measure antibody concentration. Antigen density, denatured antigen, interference, lot, instrument settings, and analysis rules can change that signal. No universal MFI cutoff defines a clinically important antibody.2,3

For platelet support, the HLA laboratory may combine the patient's HLA-A and HLA-B type with the HLA antibody profile. An exact HLA match is one option. Antibody-specific prediction expands the search by excluding donors who carry antigens targeted by the patient's antibodies. A platelet crossmatch tests patient serum against donor platelets and can detect incompatibility caused by HLA or HPA antibody. The crossmatch does not identify the antibody specificity.4,5

The transplantation immunology lesson covers detailed transplant typing, donor-specific antibody assessment, and organ crossmatch policy.

Platelet transfusion refractoriness

At the bench, refractoriness appears as repeated posttransfusion platelet counts that rise little or not at all. Platelet refractoriness is a repeated lower-than-expected response to platelet transfusion. A single low posttransfusion count does not establish it. Active bleeding, fever or sepsis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, splenic sequestration, medications, and other nonimmune factors cause most cases. ABO incompatibility, HLA class I antibody, HPA antibody, and platelet-reactive autoantibody can also reduce the increment.4,5

The corrected count increment (CCI) adjusts the platelet-count change for patient size and the platelet dose:

Obtain a posttransfusion count 10 to 60 minutes after each of two sequential transfusions when evaluating a suspected refractory state. In an afebrile, nonbleeding patient receiving conventional platelets that are not pathogen reduced, a 10- to 60-minute CCI is typically greater than 7,500. A CCI below 5,000 with supportive serologic results may indicate immune refractoriness. Published and local criteria differ, and immune and nonimmune patterns overlap, so interpret a low CCI from the trend, the component, and the clinical setting together.4,5

Investigation and component selection

  1. Record the pretransfusion count, platelet dose, completion time, posttransfusion count time, and clinical factors that can consume or sequester platelets.
  2. Calculate the 10- to 60-minute CCI for two sequential transfusions under comparable conditions.
  3. If poor increments persist after nonimmune factors are assessed, test for HLA class I and HPA antibodies according to the laboratory algorithm. Obtain the patient's HLA type when HLA-selected support may be needed.
  4. Use a limited trial of crossmatch-compatible platelets or select HLA-matched or antibody-compatible platelets. Select HPA antigen-negative platelets when an HPA specificity is present, most platelet crossmatches are incompatible, or HLA-selected products fail.
  5. Measure another 10- to 60-minute posttransfusion count. If the increment does not improve despite a compatible laboratory result, reassess nonimmune causes and the selection strategy.

In many services, platelet crossmatching is faster than a donor search and tests HLA and HPA compatibility together. Highly alloimmunized patients may have too few compatible crossmatched donors. HLA matching and antibody-specific avoidance require an HLA-typed donor inventory and an interpretable antibody profile. Name the strategy used in the laboratory report, and use the word "matched" only for HLA-matched units.5,6

HNA testing

Human neutrophil antigen (HNA) nomenclature names antigen systems defined through neutrophil alloantibodies. Some carrier proteins occur on other cells, so an HNA designation does not mean that expression is limited to neutrophils.7

HNA system Gene and principal carrier Testing consequence
HNA-1 FCGR3B; CD16b or FcγRIIIb Copy number and allele variation can require molecular typing to resolve the antigen assignment
HNA-2 CD177; CD177 or NB1 Expression varies among people and among neutrophils from one person, which can weaken cell-based results
HNA-3 SLC44A2; choline transporter-like protein 2 Anti-HNA-3a is associated with severe immune TRALI; the granulocyte agglutination test (GAT) improves detection because the granulocyte immunofluorescence test (GIFT) alone can miss anti-HNA-3a
HNA-4 ITGAM; CD11b in the Mac-1 complex Antibody can be associated with alloimmune neonatal neutropenia
HNA-5 ITGAL; CD11a in the LFA-1 complex Antibody can be associated with alloimmune neonatal neutropenia

Granulocytes deteriorate rapidly after collection. Intact-cell testing therefore uses freshly collected specimens and validated handling, commonly within 24 hours, and is usually performed by a specialized laboratory. A granulocyte immunofluorescence test (GIFT) detects antibody bound to intact cells. A granulocyte agglutination test (GAT) detects visible cell agglutination. Current reference-laboratory practice combines GIFT and GAT because either method alone can miss clinically significant antibodies. GAT improves detection of anti-HNA-3a.7,8

Antigen-specific capture methods, called monoclonal antibody immobilization of neutrophil antigens (MAINA) or monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of granulocyte antigens (MAIGA), isolate a defined membrane glycoprotein before detecting bound human antibody. Assay design and available capture antibodies limit coverage, particularly for HNA-3. HNA phenotyping can demonstrate antigen expression. Genotyping predicts the antigen from the alleles tested and requires interpretation when copy-number variation, untested variants, or altered expression could affect the result. HLA class I antibody can react with intact granulocytes and obscure an HNA result, so HLA antibody testing is often performed in parallel.7,8

Neonatal neutropenia and TRALI

An investigation of suspected alloimmune neonatal neutropenia pairs maternal granulocyte antibody testing with antigen testing of the infant and parents when indicated. A maternal antibody and an incompatible paternal antigen inherited by the infant support the alloimmune pattern. Negative testing does not exclude an antibody that is weak, targets an antigen absent from the panel, or whose detection depends on cell quality. When clinical suspicion stays strong and testing is unresolved, consult the reference laboratory.7,8

Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) is a clinical diagnosis. Detection of an HLA or HNA antibody is not required to classify the reaction. In an immune-mechanism investigation, testing may identify HLA class I, HLA class II, or HNA antibody in an implicated donor and the corresponding recipient antigen. These results support the mechanism and donor evaluation. The clinical and hemovigilance investigation determines the reaction classification.9

HPA testing

Most HPA system antigens arise from a nucleotide change that produces one amino-acid difference on a platelet glycoprotein. The glycoprotein assignment matters because antigen-capture assays target a specific protein complex.10

HPA system Principal glycoprotein carrier Common laboratory application
HPA-1 GPIIIa, β3 integrin, CD61 Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT), posttransfusion purpura, and platelet refractoriness
HPA-2 GPIbα, CD42b FNAIT and platelet alloantibody investigation
HPA-3 GPIIb, αIIb integrin, CD41 FNAIT and platelet alloantibody investigation
HPA-4 GPIIIa, β3 integrin, CD61 FNAIT and platelet alloantibody investigation
HPA-5 GPIa, α2 integrin, CD49b FNAIT and platelet alloantibody investigation
HPA-15 CD109 FNAIT and platelet refractoriness; variable expression can make serologic detection difficult

Panel composition follows the population served and the reference laboratory's validation. Low-frequency HPA variants, private antigens, and CD36 deficiency can require specialized testing.

Whole-platelet solid-phase or immunofluorescence assays detect platelet-reactive antibody. A positive reaction can reflect HLA, HPA, ABO, autoantibody, or another platelet-reactive antibody. Glycoprotein-specific assays narrow that result. In the monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) method, a monoclonal antibody captures a selected platelet glycoprotein after exposure to test serum, and an anti-human reagent detects human antibody bound to the same complex. Other validated antigen-capture and bead-based assays use related principles. No single method detects every HPA antibody.6,10

HPA genotyping identifies the alleles covered by the assay and predicts the antigen profile. It can confirm an antigen incompatibility, select an antigen-negative donor, and resolve serology when platelets are unavailable or recently transfused. The report must distinguish a genotype-predicted antigen from a serologically demonstrated phenotype and state any alleles the assay does not cover.1,10

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) results when maternal antibody targets a paternally inherited fetal platelet antigen that the mother lacks. It can occur during a first pregnancy. Laboratory confirmation evaluates the incompatibility and the antibody together:

  1. Test maternal serum for platelet alloantibody with two validated serologic methods when available. Use serum when it is available, because EDTA plasma can substantially reduce anti-HPA-1a detection by MAIPA.
  2. Genotype the mother and affected neonate when neonatal DNA is available. The father's genotype can define the incompatibility and inheritance risk when the neonate is unavailable.
  3. Crossmatch maternal serum with paternal platelets. This can detect antibody against a private or low-frequency paternal antigen that is absent from a routine panel.
  4. Compare serology, genotype, platelet counts, and the clinical findings. A negative routine panel does not exclude FNAIT when the antibody is weak, develops late, or targets an antigen outside the panel. When initial serology is negative but clinical suspicion remains high, arrange reference-laboratory reassessment 2 to 8 weeks after delivery.11,13

When the clinical team orders platelets for severe neonatal thrombocytopenia or bleeding, the transfusion service issues them without waiting for test results. Issue the immediately available platelet component under the emergency or local protocol, including random-donor platelets when necessary. Supply HPA antigen-negative or otherwise compatible platelets when they can be provided without delay, and continue the laboratory investigation. State the implicated specificity and family genotypes in the laboratory report, because those findings also affect future pregnancies.11

Posttransfusion purpura

Posttransfusion purpura typically presents as abrupt, profound thrombocytopenia about 5 to 10 days after transfusion in a previously sensitized patient, often after pregnancy. Anti-HPA-1a is the classic specificity, although other HPA antibodies can occur. Both transfused and autologous platelets are cleared. The exact mechanism of autologous platelet destruction remains incompletely defined.12

The laboratory tests patient serum for HPA antibody and compares the specificity with the patient's HPA genotype. The antibody should target an antigen absent from the patient's predicted profile. The transfusion history, timing, platelet trend, and exclusion of other causes remain necessary because antibody alone does not establish the clinical diagnosis. Documented specificity informs future antigen-negative support.12

Result limits and reporting

The final interpretation should name the specimen, method, antibody class or specificity, antigen panel, genotype coverage, crossmatch result, and component-selection consequence. It should also state the limitation that matters for the case.

Result Safe interpretation Limit
HLA single-antigen bead reaction Antibody bound the HLA antigen on the named assay bead MFI is method-dependent and does not predict platelet survival
Compatible platelet crossmatch No incompatibility was detected with that donor by that method Compatibility does not guarantee an adequate increment when nonimmune consumption continues
Negative whole-platelet antibody screen No antibody was detected against the cells and antigens represented in the assay Weak antibody and antibody to a low-frequency or poorly expressed antigen can be missed
HPA genotype The tested alleles predict the reported antigen profile Untested variants and altered expression can make genotype and phenotype differ
Reactive GIFT or GAT The specimen contains granulocyte-reactive antibody HLA class I antibody and cell quality can affect specificity and sensitivity

Platelet autoantibody testing cannot establish immune thrombocytopenia, and its limited sensitivity means that a negative result cannot exclude the condition. State the method and its limit in every report so the reader knows what a negative result covers.1

Practice

Check yourself 1 of 3

Platelets rise from 10,000/µL to 25,000/µL on a count drawn 30 minutes after a transfusion of 3.0 × 10¹¹ platelets. The patient's body surface area is 1.6 m². What is the corrected count increment (CCI)?

Incorrect. This enters the increment as 15, in thousands. The conventional formula uses counts per microliter: 15,000 × 1.6 ÷ 3.0 = 8,000.

Correct. The increment is 25,000 − 10,000 = 15,000/µL, and 15,000 × 1.6 ÷ 3.0 = 8,000, with the dose entered as the number of 10¹¹ platelets. A 10- to 60-minute CCI above 7,500 is the typical response in an afebrile, nonbleeding patient.

Incorrect. This uses the posttransfusion count of 25,000/µL. The CCI uses the increment, 25,000 − 10,000 = 15,000/µL.

Review this section

Check yourself 2 of 3

A patient's platelet count after one transfusion is lower than expected, and the draw time was not recorded. Which evidence would establish platelet refractoriness?

Correct. Refractoriness is a repeated poor response. Counts drawn 10 to 60 minutes after each of two sequential transfusions, with each dose and the body surface area recorded, show whether the pattern repeats before its cause is investigated.

Incorrect. A draw time makes this one increment interpretable, but one count cannot show a repeated pattern. Bleeding, fever, sepsis, or splenic sequestration can lower a single increment.

Incorrect. An HLA antibody result shows sensitization. Antibody testing follows once timed counts show repeated poor increments and nonimmune causes have been assessed.

Review this section

Check yourself 3 of 3

A neonate has severe thrombocytopenia, and fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is strongly suspected. The mother's routine platelet-antibody panel is negative. Which interpretation fits?

Correct. A routine panel detects only antibodies to its own antigens above its sensitivity, and an antibody can also be weak or develop late. A crossmatch of maternal serum with paternal platelets, family HPA genotyping, and reference-laboratory retesting 2 to 8 weeks after delivery can still show the incompatibility.

Incorrect. An antibody against a low-frequency or private paternal antigen, or a weak antibody, can be missed by a routine panel. The paternal platelet crossmatch can detect it.

Incorrect. The panel tests only for antibodies to its own antigens, so an alloimmune cause is not excluded. The history and counts are reviewed for other causes while the family investigation continues.

Review this section

References
  1. Bloch EM, Campbell-Lee S, McKenna DH Jr, Montemayor-Garcia C, Schwartz J, Shaz B, Storry J, eds. Technical Manual. 22nd ed. AABB; 2026. Back to text
  2. American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. 2025 ASHI Standards for Accredited Laboratories. Approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services January 27, 2026. Accessed August 30, 2026. Back to text
  3. Joint United Kingdom (UK) Blood Transfusion and Tissue Transplantation Services Professional Advisory Committee. Chapter 16: HLA typing and HLA serology. Guidelines for the Blood Transfusion Services in the United Kingdom. Accessed August 30, 2026. Back to text
  4. Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies, American Red Cross, America's Blood Centers, Armed Services Blood Program. Circular of Information for the Use of Human Blood and Blood Components. June 2024. Back to text
  5. Cohn CS. Platelet transfusion refractoriness: how do I diagnose and manage? Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2020;2020(1):527-532. doi:10.1182/hematology.2020000137 Back to text
  6. American Red Cross. National Reference Laboratory for Specialized Testing. Accessed August 30, 2026. Back to text
  7. Joint United Kingdom (UK) Blood Transfusion and Tissue Transplantation Services Professional Advisory Committee. Chapter 17: granulocyte immunology. Guidelines for the Blood Transfusion Services in the United Kingdom. Accessed August 30, 2026. Back to text
  8. American Red Cross. National Neutrophil Laboratory. Accessed August 30, 2026. Back to text
  9. Vlaar APJ, Toy P, Fung M, et al. A consensus redefinition of transfusion-related acute lung injury. Transfusion. 2019;59(7):2465-2476. doi:10.1111/trf.15311 Back to text
  10. Versiti. Human Platelet Antigen (HPA) Database. Accessed August 30, 2026. Back to text
  11. Petermann R, Bakchoul T, Curtis BR, Mullier F, Miyata S, Arnold DM; Subcommittee on Platelet Immunology. Investigations for fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16(12):2526-2529. doi:10.1111/jth.14294 Back to text
  12. Hawkins J, Aster RH, Curtis BR. Post-transfusion purpura: current perspectives. J Blood Med. 2019;10:405-415. doi:10.2147/JBM.S189176 Back to text
  13. Sachs UJ, Bedei I, Wienzek-Lischka S, et al. Diagnosis and management of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: an update 2025. Transfus Med Hemother. 2025;52(5):318-333. doi:10.1159/000547985 Accessed September 17, 2026. Back to text

Blood Banking, lesson 13 of 17

End of Leukocyte and Platelet Antigen Testing

Back to top
More about this lesson