Adsorption, elution, thiols and mixed fields
18 min
Skills you'll build4 skills
- Choose autologous or allogeneic adsorption from the recent transfusion history
- Interpret an eluate against its last-wash control
- Read DTT-treated test results knowing which antigens DTT destroys
- Choose molecular follow-up when serologic phenotyping is unreliable
At the bench: Use the antibody workup to select suitable donor units
Try first
Get the idea
Use the explanation to check your first decision.
Autoantibody adsorption
A warm autoantibody that reacts with every cell can mask an alloantibody. Adsorption removes the autoantibody from the plasma, and the adsorbed plasma is tested again.1,2
- Autologous adsorption uses the patient's own red cells. It needs a patient with no transfusion in the past 3 months and enough red cells.
- Allogeneic adsorption uses selected donor cells of known phenotypes. It is used after a transfusion in the past 3 months, because donor cells still circulating in the patient would remove an alloantibody along with the autoantibody. The cells are selected so that each common clinically significant alloantibody remains in at least one adsorbed aliquot.1,2
Elution and the last wash
Elution frees antibody bound to red cells. The recovered fluid, the eluate, is tested with panel cells like a plasma.1,3 The cells are washed before elution, and the last wash is tested beside the eluate. A reactive last wash means free plasma antibody was carried over, and the eluate cannot be interpreted.3 With a nonreactive last wash, a specific eluate after a transfusion identifies an alloantibody bound to donor cells. An eluate reacting with every cell fits a warm autoantibody.1,2
DTT and anti-CD38 drugs
Daratumumab and other anti-CD38 drugs bind CD38 on reagent red cells, so the plasma reacts with every cell at the antiglobulin phase. Treating the reagent cells with dithiothreitol (DTT) destroys CD38 and removes the interference.4 DTT also destroys Kell antigens, so a DTT-treated screen cannot detect anti-K. K-negative units are given unless the patient is known to be K-positive. Antibodies to k, Yta and Dombrock antigens can also be missed.4
Typing a mixed population
After a recent transfusion, the specimen contains donor and patient red cells. A serologic phenotype tests the mixture and can show antigens the patient lacks. A strongly positive DAT can also distort typing.1 Red cell genotyping predicts the patient's antigens from DNA and avoids both problems. Reference laboratories can also type a separated fraction of the patient's own young red cells.1,5
Follow the bench demonstration
Sources for this step
References
- Bloch EM, Campbell-Lee S, McKenna DH Jr, Montemayor-Garcia C, Schwartz J, Shaz B, Storry J, eds. Technical Manual. 22nd ed. AABB; 2026.
- Johnson ST, Puca KE. Evaluating patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia in the transfusion service and immunohematology reference laboratory: pretransfusion testing challenges and best transfusion-management strategies. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2022;2022(1):96-104. doi:10.1182/hematology.2022000406
- Raman L, Armstrong B, Smart E. Principles of laboratory techniques. ISBT Sci Ser. 2020;15(suppl 1):81-111. doi:10.1111/voxs.12591
- Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies. Association Bulletin #16-02: Mitigating the Anti-CD38 Interference With Serologic Testing. Revised March 2026. Accessed September 27, 2026. https://www.aabb.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/resources/association-bulletins/ab16-02-revised.pdf?sfvrsn=bd0f61d2_14
- Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies. Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens. 7th ed. AABB; 2024.
Watch one
Read each decision and its explanation.
A woman transfused 10 days ago has a direct antiglobulin test (DAT) that is IgG-positive, 1+ and mixed field. An acid eluate from her red cells and the last wash are tested with the panel at the antiglobulin phase. The last wash is nonreactive with every cell. The eluate:
What does the eluate show?
| Cell | D | C | E | c | e | K | k | Fya | Fyb | Jka | Jkb | M | N | S | s | AHG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 2+ |
| 2 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | 1+ |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | 2+ |
| 8 | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 |
| 10 | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 1+ |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 1+ |
- Read the last wash first. It is nonreactive with every cell, so the eluate can be interpreted.
A reactive last wash would mean carried-over plasma antibody and would invalidate the eluate.
- Look at the reaction pattern. The eluate reacts with 5 of 11 cells.
An eluate reacting with every cell fits an autoantibody. Reactions with only some cells suggest a specificity.
- Cross out on the nonreactive cells 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9. Every antigen except Fya is excluded.
The eluate is read with the same exclusion rules as a plasma.
- Check the reactive cells. All 5 carry Fya. The Fy(a+b−) cells 1 and 7 react 2+, and the Fy(a+b+) cells react 1+.
Stronger reactions on homozygous cells fit a Duffy antibody.
- Confirm her type from a pretransfusion specimen or by genotyping. She is Fy(a−).
She cannot make anti-Fya if she carries Fya, and a posttransfusion specimen contains donor cells.
Your turn
| Cell | D | C | E | c | e | K | k | Fya | Fyb | Jka | Jkb | M | N | S | s | AHG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 |
| 3 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 2+ |
| 4 | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | 1+ |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 |
| 8 | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 |
| 9 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 1+ |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 |
Use it
Read the case evidence, then make each decision. The step is complete without it.
- Evelyn Coates, 68, a retired piano teacher (MRN 6204417), has multiple myeloma and receives daratumumab, an anti-CD38 drug.
- She received 2 units of red cells 4 weeks ago at another hospital. No phenotype or genotype from before the drug is on file.
- Today her plasma reacts 1+ with every screening and panel cell at the antiglobulin phase. Her autocontrol is nonreactive.
- Her antibody screen with DTT-treated screening cells is nonreactive.
- She needs 1 unit of red cells today.
Two facts on her record directed this workup: daratumumab therapy and a transfusion 4 weeks ago. The drug explains the panreactivity and requires DTT-treated cells, which cannot detect anti-K. The recent transfusion makes serologic typing unreliable, so her antigen profile comes from genotyping.
Review missed questions
For reference
Sources checked