Skip to content

Add your earlier progress to your account?

From before you signed in, this browser has:

Which plan do you want to keep?

You answered the plan questions before signing in. These answers differ from the plan saved on your account.

SettingSaved planNew answers

Study progress is waiting to be saved

Flow Cytometry, Immunoassay Automation, and Molecular Methods

  • 16 min
  • 7 sections
  • 3 self-checks
On this page

Flow cytometry, automated immunoassay, and molecular testing produce different signals. In each method, a result is interpretable only when specimen preparation, selective recognition, detection, controls, and data analysis all perform as validated. Automation makes these steps faster and more reproducible. It does not correct an unsuitable specimen or an unvalidated decision rule.

Flow cytometry

A flow cytometer measures light scatter and fluorescence from cells or particles as they pass an interrogation point. Each recorded particle is an event. Identifying the recorded cells or particles requires a validated combination of specimen preparation, scatter, fluorescence markers, controls, and gating.

Fluidics, optics, and electronics

Subsystem Function What can go wrong
Sample preparation Creates a single-cell suspension and adds fluorochrome-labeled reagents Clots, aggregates, dead cells, incomplete lysis, cell loss, nonspecific staining
Fluidics Carries events in single file through the interrogation point, commonly by hydrodynamic focusing within sheath fluid Air, obstruction, unstable pressure, coincidence, incorrect flow rate
Excitation optics Directs one or more lasers to the sample stream Misalignment, unstable laser output, wrong filter configuration
Collection optics Routes forward scatter, side scatter, and emission bands to detectors Dirty optics, spectral overlap, damaged filters
Detectors and electronics Convert photons to pulse measurements such as area, height, and width Detector saturation, excess noise, wrong gain or threshold
Analysis software Applies compensation or unmixing, gates, calculations, and reporting rules Wrong control, gate drift, omitted population, wrong denominator, version change

Forward scatter often correlates with particle size within a fixed optical system and specimen preparation. Side scatter often correlates with refractive and internal complexity. Neither parameter is an absolute measurement of size or granularity, and scatter alone cannot establish lineage. Fluorochrome-labeled antibodies or probes add measurements tied to selected targets.1,2

A conventional cytometer sends emission through filters to separate detectors. Because fluorochrome emission spectra overlap, signal from one label can enter another detector. Compensation estimates that spillover from single-stained controls measured on the same instrument and subtracts it mathematically. A spectral cytometer records a wider emission signature and uses spectral unmixing to estimate each fluorochrome contribution. Both methods require controls matched to the fluorochromes, the instrument configuration, and the specimen's autofluorescence.

From a focused cell to measured lightAbove, sheath fluid narrows a sample into single-file cells crossing a laser. A dashed viewing guide connects this interrogation point to an end-on optical view below. Forward scatter is collected close to the laser axis while a beam stop blocks the direct beam. A perpendicular collection lens gathers side scatter and fluorescence. Dichroic mirrors separate wavelengths, and bandpass filters select light for the side-scatter and two fluorescence detectors. Dashed electrical connections carry detector signals to electronics and analysis.FluidicsElectrical signalSampleSheath fluidSingle-file cellsLaserSame interrogation pointViewed along the cell stream belowOpticsLaserBeam stopForward scatterNear the laser axis90° collectionCollection lensFiltersDetectorsSide scatterDichroic mirrorsSeparate wavelengthsFluorescence 1Fluorescence 2Bandpass filtersselect each bandElectronicsPulse area, height, widthAnalysisCompensation, gates, reports
A simplified conventional flow cytometer. Dichroic mirrors separate wavelengths, and bandpass filters select the light reaching each detector. Each optical path has a different color for clarity. The colors do not specify wavelengths. Air or obstruction, unstable laser output or misalignment, and spectral spillover affect different parts of this sequence.

Plots, gates, and controls

A histogram shows one parameter against event count. A dot or density plot shows two. A gate is an analysis boundary that selects events for another measurement or calculation. A documented gating strategy commonly considers acquisition stability, debris, singlets, viability when it matters, and population-defining markers. A debris gate on forward scatter against side scatter (forward scatter area, FSC-A, against side scatter area, SSC-A, the pulse areas) removes low-scatter events. A singlet gate compares pulse area with pulse height (FSC-A against FSC-H), because a doublet adds area without a matching rise in height. A viability dye separates cells with compromised membranes. A lineage plot such as CD45 against side scatter separates lymphocytes, monocytes, and granulocytes before subset markers are applied. The order of these gates depends on the assay, specimen, controls, and analysis objective. In any order, an event excluded at one gate is excluded from all downstream analysis.

Flow cytometry: sequential gatingSequential plots remove debris, select singlets, assess viability, and resolve leukocyte populations. Each plot receives retained events from the preceding step; exact gates and order are assay-specific.Flow cytometry: sequential gatingUse multiple parameters to retain the population of interest.1 Remove debrisSSC-AFSC-ACellsDebris2 Select singletsFSC-HFSC-ASingletsDoublets3 Assess viabilityViability dyeFSC-ALiveDead4 Resolve populationsSSC-ACD45GMLEach step receives only events retained at the previous step.G: granulocytes; M: monocytes; L: lymphocytes.Sequence and gates are assay-specific; back-gate to verify identity.
A representative gating sequence in which each plot receives only the events retained at the preceding step. The exact sequence and gates depend on the assay.

Common controls and their purposes:

  • Instrument performance particles track alignment, detector response, background, and day-to-day stability.
  • An unstained specimen shows autofluorescence and baseline signal.
  • Single-stained controls support compensation or unmixing.
  • Fluorescence-minus-one controls can show spread from the other fluorochromes near a difficult gate.
  • Viability reagents identify cells with compromised membranes when viability affects interpretation.
  • Assay-specific positive and negative materials challenge staining, processing, and analysis.

An isotype control can investigate selected nonspecific binding questions. It does not reproduce every source of background and cannot set every positive gate. Choose controls that resemble the test specimen and pass through the steps they are meant to assess.

Anticoagulant, transport, storage, lysis, fixation, staining time, and acquisition stability are assay-specific. Fixed hour limits cannot be transferred between panels or specimen types. Follow the validated collection and stability instructions, and record any deviation.

Enumeration and immunophenotyping

A dual-platform absolute count combines a cytometric percentage with an absolute count from a hematology analyzer:

Absolute subset count = absolute parent-population count × subset fraction

If the absolute lymphocyte count is 1,800 cells/µL and 16% of the validated lymphocyte gate meets the CD3/CD4 definition:

Absolute CD3/CD4 count = 1,800 cells/µL × 0.16 = 288 cells/µL

Both instruments contribute error. The analyzer's count has its own imprecision, and the denominator can shift if debris or doublets pass through the lymphocyte gate.

Single-platform methods derive the count in the cytometer using a known bead concentration, a measured sample volume, or another validated counting method. They avoid combining two separately measured patient values. Bead recovery, pipetting, acquisition volume, and event loss still require control. CLSI H42-A2 covers specimen handling, staining, instrument calibration, analysis, and reporting for lymphocyte-subset and CD34 enumeration. The document was reaffirmed in 2017.3

No marker is unique to one cell or disease. Intensity, maturation, antigen combinations, specimen type, morphology, genetics, and clinical context determine what a marker means, and no single familiar pattern substitutes for the full validated panel. HIV Testing and Monitoring explains CD4 interpretation, and the Immunology, Hematology, Blood Banking, and other area lessons cover their disease-specific panels and how to interpret them.

Automated immunoassay systems

An automated immunoassay analyzer can perform specimen aspiration, reagent addition, mixing, incubation, bound-free separation when required, signal generation, detection, calculation, and transmission to the laboratory information system. A batch system groups specimens for one assay. A random-access system schedules different assays for different specimens as orders arrive. Actual throughput depends on incubation times, reagent capacity, maintenance, repeats, dilutions, and instrument scheduling.

Use the analytic sequence to locate a failure:

  1. The probe or disposable tip identifies and aspirates the specimen.
  2. Reagent identity, lot, volume, storage, and onboard stability are checked.
  3. The reaction is mixed and incubated under controlled time and temperature.
  4. A heterogeneous assay separates bound from free label and washes the reaction vessel.
  5. The detector measures absorbance, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, electrochemiluminescence, or another validated signal.
  6. Software applies calibration, flags, dilution rules, and the reportable result.

Clot detection, liquid-level sensing, pressure monitoring, barcodes, disposable tips, and wash cycles reduce specific risks. Each safeguard has a detection limit. Carryover can come from a sample probe, reagent probe, mixer, wash station, reaction vessel, or software sequence. An acceptable global carryover check does not show that carryover is acceptable for every high-to-low analyte pair.

In a sandwich assay, signal commonly increases with captured measurand. In a competitive assay, signal commonly decreases as patient measurand displaces labeled material. The analyzer must apply the calibration model the assay design requires. The failure modes also depend on the design. Automation does not remove antigen excess, endogenous antibodies, biotin exposure, matrix effects, or cross-reactivity. Serologic Procedures and Test Results covers immunoassay formats and interpretation.1,2

Before patient reporting, verify specimen and reagent handling, carryover where relevant, calibration, precision, bias, measuring interval, reference intervals or decision limits, units, dilution and reflex rules, flags, critical-result handling, and interface transmission. Train operators on loading, maintenance, error recovery, and result review. Quality Control, Method Evaluation, and Quality Management covers the shared verification and quality framework.

Molecular testing begins before amplification

The target form, specimen, collection device, transport, storage, pretreatment, extraction, and input amount all affect a molecular result before amplification begins. DNA, RNA, intact cells, cell-free nucleic acid, and fixed tissue need different processes. CLSI MM13, second edition, provides current guidance for specimen collection, transport, preparation, storage, isolation, and evaluation across molecular methods.4

Extraction and purification

Every extraction combines disruption or lysis with removal of substances that inhibit or interfere with the downstream method.

Approach Separation principle Main limitation to control
Organic extraction Phenol and chloroform partition protein and lipid away from an aqueous nucleic-acid phase, followed by precipitation Hazardous reagents, phase carryover, variable recovery
Salting out High salt precipitates protein. Nucleic acid remains in solution and is then precipitated Residual salt and manual handling
Silica solid phase Nucleic acid binds silica under chaotropic (protein- and water-structure-disrupting), high-salt conditions, is washed, and elutes under low-salt conditions Incomplete lysis, wash carryover, column capacity
Magnetic particles Functionalized beads bind nucleic acid and move through automated wash and elution steps Bead carryover, magnetic separation, platform-specific yield
Crude resin or heat preparation Rapid lysis releases target with limited purification Variable purity and restricted downstream compatibility

Extraction efficiency depends on specimen matrix, target location, target length, input, lysis, and elution volume. A method that recovers abundant genomic DNA can still recover cell-free DNA or RNA poorly. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue often yields cross-linked, fragmented nucleic acid, and fixation time, block age, tumor selection, extraction chemistry, and assay target length all affect the usable yield. RNA workflows also control ribonuclease exposure and may need a reverse-transcription step.

Mitochondrial targets can be measured from a total-nucleic-acid extract or after a validated enrichment step. The chosen workflow must control recovery, heteroplasmy detection, and interference from homologous nuclear mitochondrial sequences. The assay determines whether separate mitochondrial isolation is needed.4,5

Quantity, purity, and integrity

Ultraviolet absorbance at 260 nm estimates total nucleic acid under a defined path length and background correction, and absorbance ratios such as A260/A280 can reveal gross protein or solvent contamination. Pure DNA gives an A260/A280 ratio near 1.8, and pure RNA a ratio near 2.0.9 An acceptable ratio screens only for gross contamination. Purity, integrity, and assay suitability require other evidence. Buffers or low concentration can distort the ratio.

Fluorometric dyes can be more selective for double-stranded DNA, single-stranded DNA, or RNA and are useful at lower concentrations. Gel or capillary electrophoresis and microfluidic systems show size distribution and degradation. None of these measurements guarantees amplifiability. The downstream assay defines acceptable concentration, integrity, fragment distribution, and inhibitor tolerance.1,2,4

Hybridization and nucleic-acid separation

A nucleic-acid probe recognizes a complementary sequence, and stringency describes how closely a duplex must match to survive the reaction conditions. Temperature, salt concentration, probe length, base composition, formamide, and wash conditions set that requirement. Higher temperature, lower salt concentration, and more formamide raise stringency.10 High stringency favors closely matched duplexes. Low stringency permits more mismatches. Probe design must also address homologous sequences, pseudogenes, repetitive regions, and secondary structure, because a strong signal can still come from an unintended complementary sequence.

Agarose gels separate a broad range of nucleic-acid fragments according to size, with concentration, voltage, buffer, and run time setting useful resolution. Polyacrylamide provides finer resolution for small fragments. Capillary electrophoresis uses a sieving polymer and fluorescent detection for fragment analysis and Sanger sequencing. Fluorescent stains and ultraviolet or visible-light systems have product-specific binding, sensitivity, and hazards. Follow the safety data and validated detection method.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) periodically changes field direction to separate very large DNA fragments. Its greatest historical role was bacterial subtyping. All 50 US state public-health laboratories completed the transition from PFGE to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for PulseNet surveillance and outbreak detection in 2019, and WGS is now the standard approach for that work. PFGE resolves fragment sizes beyond the range of conventional gels and remains in use for selected non-surveillance applications.6

Polymerase chain reaction

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifies a region between two primers. A reaction contains template, forward and reverse primers, deoxynucleotide triphosphates, a thermostable polymerase, magnesium and buffer, and any assay-specific probe or control. Cycling repeats three functions:

  1. Denaturation separates double-stranded template.
  2. Annealing lets primers bind complementary targets.
  3. Extension lets polymerase synthesize from each primer's 3′ end.

Perfect doubling would produce 2N copies from one starting copy after N cycles. Real reactions lose efficiency through reagent limits, inhibitors, competing products, and changing kinetics. The ideal expression describes exponential amplification and is not a quantitative calibration model.

PCR format Distinguishing feature Primary control concern
End-point PCR Product is detected after cycling Plateau-phase signal is poorly suited to starting-quantity measurement
Reverse-transcription PCR RNA is converted to complementary DNA before amplification Reverse-transcription efficiency and RNA integrity
Multiplex PCR Several target systems share one reaction Primer interaction, competition, and target-specific sensitivity
Allele-specific PCR Primer or probe discrimination targets a selected sequence change Nearby variants and mismatch position
Nested PCR A second internal primer pair amplifies first-round product High carryover-contamination risk
Real-time quantitative PCR Fluorescence is measured during every cycle Efficiency, threshold setting, calibration, and inhibition
Digital PCR Sample is partitioned and positive partitions are counted Partition volume, classification threshold, and molecular occupancy model

Real-time PCR can use a double-stranded-DNA-binding dye or a sequence-specific probe. A dye reports any compatible double-stranded product, including primer dimers. A hydrolysis probe adds recognition between the primers and separates reporter from quencher during extension. Other probe designs use hybridization-dependent fluorescence or energy transfer. Assess specificity from the primers, probes, cycling conditions, and analysis together. The dye name does not establish performance.

The quantification cycle, written Cq and also called Ct by some platforms, occurs earlier when more amplifiable target is present. Comparing Cq values across runs or assays requires compatible efficiency, threshold, calibration, and input. MIQE 2.0 updates the information needed to evaluate quantitative real-time PCR experiments, including sample processing, assay specificity, efficiency, controls, data analysis, and reporting.7

Controls that localize failure

Control Enters workflow Detects
Negative extraction control Before extraction Contamination introduced during extraction and later steps
No-template amplification control At reaction setup Contaminated amplification reagents or setup environment
Positive control At the step defined by the assay Failure to detect a known target; coverage depends on when it is added
Internal amplification control In the same reaction or sample path Inhibition or reaction failure, within its validated competitive effect
Specimen-adequacy control Patient specimen Presence and recovery of a selected host or specimen target

A positive amplification control added after extraction cannot prove extraction worked. A negative-template control cannot reveal contamination introduced before amplification setup. Place each control so that it spans the failure it is meant to detect.

PCR controls: coverage and failure detectionPCR controls: coverage and failure detectionWhat a failed control shows depends on its purpose and entry point.ExtractionSetupAmplificationDetectionNegative extraction controlStarts with extraction.Detects process contamination.No-template controlStarts at reaction setup.Detects setup/reagent contamination.Positive controlKnown detectable control material.Coverage depends on entry point.Internal amplification controlIncluded with individual samples.Detects inhibition or reaction failure.Specimen-adequacy controlAssesses suitable specimen material.Recovery alone does not prove adequacy.Solid: covered stages. Dashed: coverage depends on assay design.A failed control requires the assay's defined corrective action.
Each PCR control detects failures in the steps it covers. Dashed segments show where coverage depends on when the control is added.

Pre-amplification reagent preparation, specimen processing, amplification, and post-amplification analysis use separated space, dedicated supplies, controlled movement, and cleaning validated for the target and surface. Uracil-N-glycosylase systems can reduce carryover from compatible uracil-containing amplicons. They do not remove native target or amplicons made without that chemistry, and the chemistry is incompatible with nested PCR, whose first-round product must survive to the second round. Ultraviolet exposure and chemical decontamination also have material, shadowing, concentration, contact-time, and safety limits. CLSI MM03 remains an archived, technically valid source for amplification controls, inhibitors, false-positive control, and quality assurance in infectious-disease molecular testing.8

Sequencing

Sanger sequencing

Sanger sequencing extends a primer with ordinary nucleotides and fluorescent chain-terminating dideoxynucleotides. Terminated fragments form a nested size series. Capillary electrophoresis separates them, and detector color produces an electropherogram. Base-call quality can fall near the primer, through long homopolymers, across mixed templates, and later in a read. A heterozygous insertion or deletion can create overlapping sequence downstream.

Sanger sequencing remains useful for limited-content assays, fill-in of poorly covered regions, and confirmation of variants already found by another validated method. Low allele fractions, mixed templates, and some sequence contexts exceed what a population-level trace can resolve. The confirming method must have adequate sensitivity for the allele fraction, variant type, and sequence context.5

Targeted incorporation and methylation methods

Pyrosequencing detects the pyrophosphate released as each supplied nucleotide is incorporated, and an enzyme cascade converts that release into light. It supports short targeted reads and quantitative applications such as selected methylation measurements. Nucleotide-dispensing order, background, incomplete extension, and homopolymer length affect the signal.

Bisulfite treatment converts most unmethylated cytosine to uracil, which is read as thymine after amplification. Methylated cytosine (5-methylcytosine) is generally retained as cytosine. Conversion efficiency, DNA degradation, incomplete conversion, and sequence-dependent amplification require controls. The sequence comparison estimates methylation only at loci covered by the validated assay.1,2

High-throughput sequencing

A clinical next-generation sequencing workflow follows validated steps from specimen to report:

  1. Extract and assess nucleic acid.
  2. Create a library with platform adapters and sample identifiers.
  3. Enrich selected regions by amplification or hybrid capture when the assay is targeted.
  4. Generate sequence reads with the validated platform chemistry.
  5. Demultiplex, perform quality filtering, and align reads to a stated reference.
  6. Call the supported variant classes and apply validated filters.
  7. Annotate, classify, interpret, review, and report within the assay's scope.

Fluorescent reversible-terminator systems image incorporated bases cycle by cycle. Semiconductor systems sense hydrogen ions released during incorporation. Platform chemistry affects error patterns, read structure, and detectable variants. Library fragment length, read depth, uniformity, strand balance, mapping quality, allele fraction, contamination, index errors, and difficult sequence regions all influence performance.

Bioinformatics is part of the measurement procedure. Software versions, reference builds, databases, parameters, and report rules need change control and validation. A high average depth does not compensate for a clinically important exon with no usable reads. A negative report covers only the variant classes inside the validated assay. CLSI MM09, third edition, provides current recommendations for design, development, validation, reporting, and continual quality management of human Sanger and high-throughput sequencing tests.5

The Microbiology, Hematology, Immunology, Chemistry, Blood Banking, and other area lessons cover target selection and interpretation. Check the instrument principles and controls described here before you release a result from these platforms.

Practice

Check yourself 1 of 3

The white blood cell (WBC) count is 8,000 cells/µL with 25% lymphocytes, and 40% of the lymphocytes meet the CD3/CD4 definition. What is the absolute CD3/CD4 count?

Incorrect. Multiplying the whole WBC count by 0.40 gives this value. The 40% is a fraction of the lymphocytes, so the parent count is 8,000 cells/µL × 0.25 = 2,000 lymphocytes/µL.

Correct. Absolute lymphocytes = 8,000 cells/µL × 0.25 = 2,000 cells/µL, and the CD3/CD4 count = 2,000 cells/µL × 0.40 = 800 cells/µL. Each percentage is applied to its own parent population.

Incorrect. Dividing 2,000 lymphocytes/µL by 0.40 reverses the calculation and gives a subset larger than its own parent population.

Review this section

Check yourself 2 of 3

A hybridization probe gives signal from a related sequence that differs from its target by a few bases. Which change to the wash conditions reduces that signal while the matched target stays bound?

Incorrect. A lower temperature lowers stringency and lets more mismatched duplexes remain bound, so the signal from the related sequence would rise.

Incorrect. Higher salt concentration lowers stringency, so duplexes with a few mismatches stay bound alongside the matched target.

Correct. A higher temperature raises stringency. Duplexes with a few mismatched bases dissociate, and the fully matched probe-target duplex remains bound.

Review this section

Check yourself 3 of 3

In a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) run, a patient specimen shows no target signal and no internal control signal. The internal control was added to the specimen before extraction. The positive control added at reaction setup is detected, and the no-template control is negative. Which step most likely failed?

Incorrect. The positive control used the same reagents and cycling and was detected, so amplification worked in this run.

Correct. Only the control that went through this specimen's extraction failed, which indicates extraction loss or an inhibitor carried into the extract. The result is invalid. Retest the specimen from extraction or request a new collection.

Incorrect. A specimen without the target still gives an internal control signal. With that signal missing too, the run is invalid for this specimen, and a not-detected result cannot be reported.

Review this section

References
  1. Bishop ML, Fody EP, Van Siclen C, Mistler JM, Moy M. Clinical Chemistry: Principles, Techniques, and Correlations. 9th ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2023. Back to text
  2. Rifai N, Chiu RWK, Young I, Burnham CAD, Wittwer CT, eds. Tietz Textbook of Laboratory Medicine. 7th ed. Elsevier; 2023. Back to text
  3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Enumeration of Immunologically Defined Cell Populations by Flow Cytometry. 2nd ed. CLSI guideline H42-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2007. Reaffirmed June 2017. Accessed August 31, 2026. Back to text
  4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Collection, Transport, Preparation, and Storage of Specimens for Molecular Methods. 2nd ed. CLSI guideline MM13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2020. Accessed August 31, 2026. Back to text
  5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Human Genetic and Genomic Testing Using Traditional and High-Throughput Nucleic Acid Sequencing Methods. 3rd ed. CLSI guideline MM09. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2023. Accessed August 31, 2026. Back to text
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. PulseNet timeline. Accessed August 31, 2026. Back to text
  7. Bustin SA, Ruijter JM, van den Hoff MJB, et al. MIQE 2.0: revision of the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments guidelines. Clin Chem. 2025;71(6):634-651. doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvaf043 Back to text
  8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Molecular Diagnostic Methods for Infectious Diseases. 3rd ed. CLSI report MM03. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015. Archived and retained as technically valid. Accessed August 31, 2026. Back to text
  9. Powell EA, Mortensen JE. Extraction of total nucleic acids from bacterial isolates using the bioMérieux NucliSENS easyMAG total nucleic acid extractor. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2016;15(1):54. doi:10.1186/s12941-016-0168-7 Back to text
  10. Gibriel A. Effect of target length on specificity and sensitivity of oligonucleotide microarrays: a comparison between dendrimer and modified PCR based labelling methods. Open Biochem J. 2014;8:11-20. doi:10.2174/1874091X01408010011 Back to text

Laboratory Operations, lesson 8 of 9

End of Flow Cytometry, Immunoassay Automation, and Molecular Methods

Where this connects

  • Laboratory OperationsCalculate an absolute subset count using the correct parent populationImmunologyCalculate a CD4-to-CD8 ratio from comparable absolute counts

    A dual-platform CD4 count multiplies the analyzer's absolute lymphocyte count by the CD4 fraction of the lymphocyte gate, and a single-platform count uses counting beads in the same tube.

Practice this lesson

Back to top
More about this lesson