Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) exposes an isolated pathogen to an antimicrobial agent and measures growth inhibition. Inhibition is the routine endpoint. Killing endpoints are used only in specialized bactericidal tests. Four Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) documents provide standardized methods and interpretations used in US laboratories: M02 for disk diffusion, M07 for dilution methods, M11 for anaerobes, and M100 for the interpretive breakpoint and quality-control tables, currently in its 36th edition, M100-Ed36, published January 2026. A July 9, 2026 correction notice restored the sulfamethoxazole half of the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints for the Streptococcus spp. β-hemolytic group (for example, the susceptible breakpoint previously written as 0.5 or less is now 0.5/9.5 µg/mL or less). That table applies only to skin and skin-structure isolates, and CLSI directs laboratories not to test TMP-SMX against β-hemolytic streptococci by agar-based methods on sheep-blood Mueller-Hinton agar, because the added thymidine causes false resistance.1
CLSI revises M100 annually, and breakpoints for a given organism-drug combination can change between editions. The January 2024 implementation requirement described in the CLSI toolkit comes from College of American Pathologists (CAP) accreditation requirements. Record the breakpoint source and version in use, and review them for currency. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognition also has drug-specific exceptions and additions. Recognition of a standard does not mean that every table entry is accepted without exception.2,3 Updating a commercial system requires verification or validation appropriate to its clearance status and the proposed change. The toolkit distinguishes verification of cleared performance from validation when the laboratory modifies a cleared test.2 M100 interpretations depend on the corresponding standardized M02, M07, or M11 method. A changed method cannot automatically retain the original interpretive criteria.1
Mycobacterial and Nocardia susceptibility procedures are covered in mycobacteriology.
Principles, media, inoculum, and incubation
Mueller-Hinton medium is the standard medium because its lots perform consistently and it contains little of the inhibitors that distort several drug classes: thymidine and thymine, which antagonize sulfonamides and trimethoprim, and excess divalent cations, which distort aminoglycoside and tetracycline results. Excess calcium and magnesium make Pseudomonas aeruginosa falsely resistant to aminoglycosides. Low cation content makes it falsely susceptible. The agar must have a final pH of 7.2 to 7.4 and a depth of 4 mm. Agar that is too deep thins the antibiotic gradient and makes the isolate look more resistant. Agar that is too shallow makes it look more susceptible. Disk diffusion uses Mueller-Hinton agar. Broth dilution uses cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB), adjusted to roughly 20 to 25 mg/L calcium and 10 to 12.5 mg/L magnesium. Do not use unadjusted broth, because aminoglycoside and tetracycline MICs shift with cation content.4,5
Fastidious organisms need supplementation or a different medium: 5% sheep blood on Mueller-Hinton agar for streptococci by disk diffusion, 2.5 to 5% lysed horse blood in CAMHB for streptococci by dilution, Haemophilus test medium (HTM) for Haemophilus influenzae, and GC agar base with 1% defined growth supplement for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Anaerobes are tested in supplemented Brucella media (see below). Disk diffusion is not a standardized method for anaerobes.
Prepare a 0.5 McFarland suspension, about 1 to 2 × 108 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL, from fresh colonies by direct suspension, or by growth in broth when the organism will not suspend cleanly. For broth microdilution, dilute that suspension to a final inoculum of about 5 × 105 CFU/mL. The 0.5 McFarland standard sets the density of the stock suspension, and the dilution step sets the final concentration in the well. Use the inoculated plate or tray within the time window the method specifies, because a standardized inoculum is part of the method.
Routine incubation is 35 °C ± 2 °C, and the reading time is set by each organism-drug table: disk diffusion for the common rapidly growing organisms is read at 16 to 18 hours, and dilution at 16 to 20 hours. Cefoxitin disk diffusion is read at 16 to 18 hours for Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus lugdunensis, and at 24 hours for Staphylococcus epidermidis and other staphylococcal species for which that method is applicable.23 Oxacillin and vancomycin MIC tests of staphylococci, and vancomycin testing of enterococci, require a full 24 hours. An MIC endpoint is a concentration. A disk-diffusion endpoint is a zone diameter. Haemophilus zones are read at 16 to 18 hours in 5% CO2. Streptococcal zones are read at 20 to 24 hours in 5% CO2. Testing staphylococci above 35 °C can also miss methicillin resistance.1,6,7
Interpretation: MIC, breakpoints, and categories
The MIC is the lowest concentration that prevents visible growth. The report requires an interpretive category, assigned by comparing the MIC with the applicable breakpoint. CLSI defines these categories:
Scroll sideways to see all columns
| Category | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Susceptible (S) | Standard dosing is likely to be effective |
| Susceptible-dose dependent (SDD) | Success depends on a dosing regimen higher than the standard one. The breakpoint states the required exposure |
| Intermediate (I) | Serves three purposes: a technical buffer around the breakpoint, a target for higher exposure, and a category for agents that concentrate at the infection site (for example, a β-lactam in urine) |
| Resistant (R) | Standard dosing has a high likelihood of failure |
| Nonsusceptible (NS) | Used when only a susceptible breakpoint exists because resistant strains are rare or have not been found. A result above the susceptible breakpoint is reported NS. NS records only that the isolate exceeds the one defined breakpoint. It does not establish a resistance mechanism |
European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) practice differs. EUCAST dropped the intermediate buffer concept and defines I as a drug-exposure target. When the urine-concentration use of I matters clinically, CLSI marks it with a superscript (I^) in the tables.8
Dilution and gradient-diffusion methods
Scroll sideways to see all columns
| Method | Format | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Broth macrodilution | Doubling dilutions in test tubes | The original reference format; too labor-intensive for routine use |
| Agar dilution | Drug incorporated into agar; isolates spotted individually | Tests many isolates against one drug on one plate; the reference method for anaerobes and for gonococci |
| Broth microdilution | Miniaturized doubling dilutions in a microtiter tray, read manually or by instrument | The reference method for most nonfastidious and selected fastidious organisms; the basis of commercial panels |
| Gradient diffusion | A strip carrying a continuous drug gradient is placed on an inoculated agar plate; the MIC is read where the growth-inhibition ellipse intersects the scale | Gives a quantitative MIC. Use it only for organism-drug combinations where the strip is cleared and validated. An on-scale reading between two doubling dilutions is rounded up to the next dilution before comparison with breakpoints |
Gradient diffusion is not valid for every combination. Colistin and polymyxin B cannot be tested this way (see below), because the strips do not reproduce their activity reliably.9 Daptomycin can be tested by gradient diffusion only with an FDA-cleared strip that contains calcium, because daptomycin activity depends on calcium and the calcium content of Mueller-Hinton agar cannot be controlled. In a 2006 comparison, strip MICs for enterococci read one dilution below reference broth microdilution often enough to call some resistant isolates susceptible, so verify the strip against the reference method before reporting it.10,11
Application: broth microdilution and breakpoint interpretation. An isolate is tested with a doubling series of Drug Y at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 µg/mL. Visible growth occurs through 2 µg/mL. The 4-µg/mL well and above stay clear. The MIC is 4 µg/mL. If the applicable breakpoints are susceptible 2 or less, intermediate 4, resistant ≥8, the isolate is intermediate.
Disk diffusion
Disk diffusion (the Kirby-Bauer method) applies to rapidly growing aerobic and facultative bacteria and to the fastidious organisms for which CLSI publishes disk criteria. A paper disk carrying a fixed drug amount is placed on a standardized lawn. The drug diffuses outward, and the zone of inhibition correlates inversely with the MIC. A 150-mm plate holds no more than 12 disks, a 100-mm plate no more than 5, and disks sit at least 24 mm apart center to center so zones do not overlap. The method is inexpensive and gives a category with no MIC, which limits its use when a quantitative result matters, as with vancomycin against S. aureus or any polymyxin.6,7
Direct β-lactamase testing is a separate rapid method: a chromogenic cephalosporin (nitrocefin) changes color when hydrolyzed. It is most useful for H. influenzae and, on selected blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) isolates of enterococci, where routine MIC testing can miss β-lactamase. A positive nitrocefin result predicts resistance to ampicillin and amoxicillin. A negative result does not establish ampicillin susceptibility, because the test does not detect β-lactamase-negative, ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) or penicillin-binding protein (PBP)-mediated resistance (see below). For S. aureus, CLSI prefers the penicillin zone-edge test before reporting penicillin susceptible, because a sharp "cliff" edge reveals penicillinase that a plain nitrocefin test can miss. For other staphylococci, CLSI recommends a nitrocefin-based test.1
Bactericidal testing
The MBC is found by subculturing the clear wells of an MIC series to drug-free agar. It is the lowest concentration that kills ≥99.9% of the original inoculum. Persisters, a small surviving subpopulation that remains fully susceptible on retesting, can blunt the endpoint, as can the Eagle (paradoxical) effect, in which very high concentrations kill less than intermediate ones. Tolerance has historically been described as an MBC:MIC ratio of at least 32. Current reviews treat that cutoff as a historical convention with no validated clinical threshold behind it, and consider time-kill methods the better reference.12
Application: MBC and the persister concept. Continuing the Drug Y case (MIC = 4 µg/mL), the clear wells at 4, 8, 16, and 32 µg/mL are subcultured to drug-free agar. The starting inoculum was about 4 × 105 CFU/mL, so 99.9% killing allows no more than 400 CFU/mL to survive. The 4-µg/mL subculture is too numerous to count, but the 8-µg/mL subculture yields 250 CFU/mL. The MBC is 8 µg/mL and the MBC:MIC ratio is 8:4 = 2, far below the conventional tolerance ratio of 32.
Automated and molecular/rapid AST
Commercial automated broth microdilution systems predominate in US clinical laboratories. Turbidimetric and fluorometric platforms read inoculated cards or trays at intervals and report an MIC and category within hours. Their advantages are paired identification and AST inoculation, expert-system software, and laboratory information system (LIS) interfacing. Verify a system against a reference method before patient reporting: best practice is at least 90% essential agreement (MIC within one doubling dilution) and 90% categorical agreement, along with a review of very major errors (false susceptible), which carry the most clinical risk. Verification is required when a system is introduced and again when it materially changes, including implementation of new breakpoints, new agents, or new software.13
Molecular AST detects resistance genes directly by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), without waiting for growth. It can return results within hours from a positive blood-culture bottle or a rectal screening swab. Interpret these results with three limits in mind. Resistance to one drug can arise from many unrelated genes. A detected gene does not prove an expressed phenotype. A negative panel excludes only the mechanisms it targets. Molecular detection is most reliable where a single dominant gene accounts for the mechanism, such as mecA in staphylococci, vanA/vanB in enterococci, or rpoB mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. CLSI also standardizes direct disk diffusion from positive blood-culture bottles for Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter, which shortens turnaround without molecular testing. Whole-genome sequencing can infer a resistance genotype without a predefined target. It misses determinants that are not yet catalogued, and it is used mainly as a reference and epidemiologic tool.1
Quality control and verification
The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) require the laboratory to check each batch of medium and each lot or shipment of antimicrobial agent before or concurrent with initial use, and to run appropriate control organisms each day tests are performed, with all results in range before patient results are reported. The default is daily quality control (QC). A laboratory may reduce frequency only under a written individualized quality control plan (IQCP), which the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) treats as voluntary and which must document the risk assessment supporting the reduction. A routine weekly QC schedule adopted without an IQCP does not meet the CLIA requirement.14,15
Standard control strains for disk diffusion and dilution QC include Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, S. aureus ATCC 29213 (MIC) or ATCC 25923 (disk), Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, H. influenzae ATCC 49247 and 49766, N. gonorrhoeae ATCC 49226, Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619, and the resistance-mechanism controls needed for specific tests (E. coli ATCC 35218, a β-lactamase producer, for inhibitor combinations; E. faecalis ATCC 51299 for vancomycin resistance). Acceptable zone and MIC limits are published in M100 for each strain-agent-method combination. Apply those published ranges. For the nitrocefin test, S. aureus ATCC 29213 is the positive control and H. influenzae ATCC 10211 the negative control. When a QC result falls out of range, stop testing, find the cause, review the patient results reported since the last in-range control, and document corrective action before reporting resumes.1,14,15
Mechanisms of action of the major antibiotic classes
Scroll sideways to see all columns
| Class | Target | Specific mechanism | Bactericidal/bacteriostatic |
|---|---|---|---|
| β-lactams (penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams) | Cell-wall synthesis | Inactivate penicillin-binding proteins, blocking peptidoglycan cross-linking | Bactericidal |
| Glycopeptides (vancomycin) | Cell-wall synthesis | Bind the D-Ala-D-Ala terminus of the pentapeptide precursor, blocking incorporation | Bactericidal |
| Fosfomycin | Cell-wall synthesis | Inactivates MurA, the first committed step of precursor synthesis | Bactericidal |
| Aminoglycosides | 30S ribosome | Irreversible binding; misreading and chain termination | Bactericidal |
| Tetracyclines | 30S ribosome | Block aminoacyl-tRNA binding at the A site | Bacteriostatic |
| Macrolides | 50S ribosome | Block translocation of the peptide chain | Bacteriostatic |
| Chloramphenicol | 50S ribosome | Inhibits peptidyl transferase | Bacteriostatic |
| Oxazolidinones (linezolid) | 50S ribosome | Block 70S initiation-complex formation | Bacteriostatic |
| Fluoroquinolones | DNA synthesis | Inhibit DNA gyrase (primary in gram-negatives) and topoisomerase IV (primary in gram-positives) | Bactericidal |
| Rifampin | RNA synthesis | Inhibits the β subunit of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase | Bactericidal |
| Sulfonamides | Folate synthesis | Competitively inhibit dihydropteroate synthase | Bacteriostatic |
| Trimethoprim | Folate synthesis | Inhibits dihydrofolate reductase; sequential blockade with a sulfonamide is synergistic | Bacteriostatic alone; TMP-SMX bactericidal |
| Metronidazole | DNA damage | Reduced anaerobically to radicals that break DNA; inactive against aerobes | Bactericidal |
| Daptomycin | Cell membrane | Calcium-dependent insertion depolarizes the gram-positive membrane | Bactericidal |
| Polymyxins (colistin, polymyxin B) | Cell membrane | Bind lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and disrupt the gram-negative outer and inner membranes | Bactericidal |
Two agents on this table have method rules that override the general methods above. Daptomycin is tested only by MIC methods: reference broth microdilution in CAMHB supplemented with calcium to 50 mg/L, or a cleared and verified calcium-containing gradient strip. Disk diffusion is not valid because the agar calcium cannot be controlled, and daptomycin is not reported for respiratory isolates, because pulmonary surfactant inactivates it. Colistin and polymyxin B are tested only by MIC methods. Disk diffusion and gradient diffusion are not valid for either. CLSI provides no susceptible category for colistin against Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, or Acinetobacter, only intermediate and resistant, because a susceptible category could not be clinically supported, so under CLSI criteria an MIC of 2 µg/mL is reported as intermediate. EUCAST publishes colistin breakpoints in brackets. These are susceptible and resistant values based on the epidemiological cutoff value (ECOFF), and the brackets warn against relying on the agent without additional therapeutic measures. EUCAST tables therefore include a susceptible column, but reporting susceptible without an explanatory comment is discouraged.9,26 For colistin, CLSI also accepts the colistin broth disk elution method. Polymyxin B is broth microdilution only. FDA recognizes CLSI's polymyxin breakpoints, listing colistimethate and polymyxin B with no exceptions.3 A laboratory that applies them on a commercial system outside its cleared labeling must validate that modified use by establishing its own performance specifications under CLIA. Verification covers only performance within the cleared labeling.2,9,10
Testing selection, intrinsic resistance, and reporting policy
Test when an organism's susceptibility is unpredictable. Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis needs no penicillin testing, because resistance has not been documented in the United States. Anaerobic susceptibility testing is indicated for isolates from brain abscess, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, joint infection, prosthetic or vascular-device infection, and bacteremia. CLSI M11 names agar dilution on supplemented Brucella blood agar as the reference method for anaerobes. Broth microdilution is acceptable for Bacteroides and Parabacteroides with selected agents. CLSI does not provide a routine anaerobic disk-diffusion method. EUCAST publishes a separate standardized method for selected rapidly growing anaerobes whose media, breakpoints, and categories are not interchangeable with CLSI's. Most Bacteroides are presumed penicillin-resistant. A positive β-lactamase test predicts penicillin and ampicillin resistance. A negative test does not establish susceptibility, because non-enzyme mechanisms also occur. β-Lactamase results do not predict piperacillin-tazobactam or carbapenem results.16
CLSI's M100 tables group suggested drugs by pathogen category and tier: Tier 1 for routine primary testing and reporting, Tier 2 for testing routinely with selective or cascade reporting, Tier 3 for institutions with endemic multidrug-resistant organisms or patients allergic to primary agents, and Tier 4 for testing or reporting on request or in special circumstances. Agents with a U designation apply to urinary isolates only. When two agents appear in the same box separated by "or", near-complete cross-susceptibility and cross-resistance mean one result predicts the other. When they share a box without "or", clinical efficacy is similar but the results do not predict each other.
Some results must never be reported as susceptible regardless of the in vitro reading, because the drug is not clinically effective for that organism or site. The recurring combinations are:
- For Salmonella and Shigella, aminoglycosides, first- and second-generation cephalosporins, and cephamycins may look active in vitro but are not clinically effective and must not be reported as susceptible. Intestinal isolates of nontyphoidal Salmonella need no routine AST. Shigella and typhoidal Salmonella always need routine AST. For extraintestinal Salmonella, the preferred fluoroquinolone test is a ciprofloxacin MIC, because plasmid-mediated low-level resistance can test susceptible by nalidixic acid or disk screen.
- For Enterococcus, cephalosporins, clindamycin, and TMP-SMX may look active in vitro but are not clinically effective and must not be reported as susceptible. Aminoglycosides are reported only through high-level synergy testing (below).
- For isolates from cerebrospinal fluid, do not report agents given by mouth only, first- and second-generation cephalosporins and cephamycins, ertapenem, doripenem, imipenem, clindamycin, macrolides, lefamulin, and tetracyclines. These are not drugs of choice for central nervous system (CNS) infection and may not reach it.
Intrinsic resistance is a property of the species: an isolate of that species is resistant regardless of what the in vitro result shows, and CLSI's intrinsic-resistance appendix lists the specific combinations that qualify. The entries seen most often include ampicillin for Klebsiella; nitrofurantoin, tetracyclines, and colistin for Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella; colistin for Serratia; carbapenems and aminoglycosides for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, whose L1 metallo-β-lactamase and efflux make it intrinsically carbapenem-resistant. In a recent change, CLSI no longer lists intrinsic-resistance entries for Burkholderia cepacia complex because the previous entries could not be confirmed. CLSI removed the complex's disk diffusion breakpoints in 2024 (34th edition) and its MIC breakpoints in 2025 (35th edition), so the current M100 publishes no breakpoints for it and recommends against routine AST. If testing is performed on request, frozen reference broth microdilution is the only reproducible method, and the result is reported with the caution that correlation of MIC values with clinical outcome is not known.1,24
Selective and cascade reporting withhold second-line agents until first-line ones are reported resistant, which preserves active drugs for genuinely resistant infections and supports stewardship. Formulary and menu decisions are made jointly with the antimicrobial stewardship team and the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee, since commercial panels constrain which drugs can be tested together. Stewardship programs also restrict specific agents so that their use needs approval. The notable example is fluoroquinolone restriction, which curbed outbreaks of fluoroquinolone-resistant ribotype 027 Clostridioides difficile as one part of a bundle of control measures.17
Antibiograms and stewardship
An antibiogram compiles a facility's cumulative susceptibility results as percentage susceptible by species and drug. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M39 5th-edition guidance recommends at least annual analysis of final, verified diagnostic results, with only the first isolate of each species per patient in the analysis period, regardless of specimen source or susceptibility pattern. Screening and surveillance records are excluded. The routine report includes species with at least 30 isolates tested and counts only susceptible results in its susceptible numerator. Intermediate and susceptible-dose-dependent categories remain distinct. Smaller groups give less precise estimates.18
Selecting isolates for an annual antibiogram
A fictional hospital reviews diagnostic cultures collected from January 1 through December 31, 2025, across its inpatient and outpatient services. Its export contains 50 Escherichia coli records. The scientist first checks collection dates, patient identifiers, species, culture purpose, and final result status. The counts below are teaching data and do not represent local resistance rates.
Scroll sideways to see all columns
| E. coli records in the export | Count | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| Screening or surveillance cultures | 8 | Exclude before selecting diagnostic isolates |
| Later diagnostic isolates from patients already represented | 8 | Exclude as repeats |
| First eligible diagnostic isolate per patient | 34 | Retain for analysis |
For example, patient P07 has a screening rectal isolate on January 1, a diagnostic blood isolate on January 3, and a diagnostic urine isolate on February 6. The January 3 isolate is retained. The later urine isolate is a repeat for this species even if its susceptibility differs. A different species from P07 would be considered separately. Thus, 50 − 8 − 8 = 34 eligible E. coli isolates from 34 patients.
Both ceftriaxone and cefepime were routinely tested on all 34 retained isolates. The extract includes verified results withheld from individual patient reports by selective reporting rules. Neither drug was tested only on resistant isolates. The laboratory's recorded breakpoint version was consistent throughout this fictional dataset. The example begins with final categories and makes no new breakpoint assignments. Using only selectively released results could distort the percentage.18
Susceptible (S), intermediate (I), susceptible-dose dependent (SDD), and resistant (R) results contribute to the tested total. Only S contributes to percent susceptible.
Scroll sideways to see all columns
| Antimicrobial | Susceptible | Other reported results | Tested total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceftriaxone | 24 S | 2 I; 8 R | 34 |
| Cefepime | 26 S | 4 SDD; 4 R | 34 |
Percent susceptible = (susceptible eligible isolates ÷ eligible isolates with a valid result for that drug) × 100. The denominators happen to match here because both drugs have results for every retained isolate. An untested isolate is excluded from that drug's denominator.
- Ceftriaxone: 24 ÷ (24 + 2 + 8) × 100 = 70.6% susceptible.
- Cefepime: 26 ÷ (26 + 4 + 4) × 100 = 76.5% susceptible.
Counting the two ceftriaxone I results as S would give 26 ÷ 34 × 100 = 76.5%. Counting the four cefepime SDD results as S would give 30 ÷ 34 × 100 = 88.2%. Both calculations overstate percent susceptible. The I and SDD isolates remain in their denominators without being relabeled R. This is the routine M39 5th-edition percent-S calculation. It does not combine categories for a separate exposure- or urinary-site analysis.18
All eight excluded diagnostic repeats were ceftriaxone R in this dataset. Including them would give 24 ÷ 42 × 100 = 57.1%, overrepresenting those repeatedly cultured patients. The exclusion rule would apply equally if the repeats were susceptible.
The laboratory publishes the two E. coli percentages with their tested counts, period, population, and selection rules after review. A separate Klebsiella pneumoniae group has only 29 eligible isolates, so its percentages are withheld from this routine report under the stated minimum rule. The antibiogram describes the selected population. It cannot change an individual isolate's reported category or establish which antimicrobial will work for a particular patient.18
General resistance mechanisms and gene transfer
Scroll sideways to see all columns
| Mechanism | Example | Agents typically affected |
|---|---|---|
| Enzymatic destruction or modification | β-lactamases; aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes | β-lactams, aminoglycosides |
| Active efflux | Multidrug pumps such as AcrAB-TolC in Enterobacterales; MefA-family macrolide pumps in streptococci; major facilitator superfamily (MFS) tetracycline exporters | Macrolides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, chloramphenicol |
| Decreased permeability (porin loss) | Loss of OprD in P. aeruginosa | Carbapenems and other β-lactams |
| Altered target | PBP2a, VISA cell-wall thickening, mutated gyrase, methylated 23S rRNA | β-lactams, vancomycin, fluoroquinolones, macrolides and lincosamides |
| Target bypass or overproduction | D-Ala-D-Lac pentapeptide; altered DHFR | Vancomycin; trimethoprim |
Resistance genes move vertically with clonal expansion under antibiotic pressure or horizontally by transformation (uptake of free DNA), transduction (phage-mediated transfer), or conjugation (cell-to-cell plasmid transfer, which crosses species boundaries). The transfer of vanA from enterococci to S. aureus, producing vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA), is the best-known example.
Scroll sideways to see all columns
| Organism | Agent | Gene(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Staphylococcus aureus | Oxacillin/methicillin | mecA (and the rarer homologue mecC) |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae | Penicillin | Mosaic pbp1a, pbp2b, and pbp2x |
| Gram-negative rods | β-lactams | blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA, blaCTX-M |
| Enterococcus | Vancomycin | vanA, vanB, vanC (intrinsic), vanD, vanE, vanG |
| Salmonella and other gram-negatives | Fluoroquinolones | gyrA, gyrB, parC, parE; plasmid qnr |
| Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Isoniazid; rifampin | katG, inhA; rpoB |
| Enterobacterales | Carbapenems | blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA-48-like, blaVIM, blaIMP |
A detected gene is conclusive evidence when an MIC is near a breakpoint. Molecular detection can also bypass culture for speed or safety. A negative molecular result excludes only the mechanisms the assay targets. A resistant phenotype can arise from an untested gene, a novel mutation, or a permeability or efflux change the panel does not target.
Staphylococcal methicillin resistance
Methicillin resistance in staphylococci comes from PBP2a, an altered penicillin-binding protein with low β-lactam affinity, encoded by mecA (or the rarer mecC) on the SCCmec cassette. It confers resistance to nearly all β-lactams except the cephalosporins active against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), such as ceftaroline. Resistance can be homogeneous, which is easy to detect, or heterogeneous, where a small resistant subpopulation makes the isolate look falsely susceptible. Detection depends on the species:
Scroll sideways to see all columns
| Method | Principle | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Oxacillin MIC | Direct test of the target drug; CAMHB or Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) plus 2% NaCl, read at 24 h | Valid across staphylococci; the usual choice for coagulase-negative species. Breakpoints differ by species (S. aureus and S. lugdunensis, susceptible 2 µg/mL or less and resistant ≥4; S. epidermidis, S. pseudintermedius and S. schleiferi, susceptible 0.25 or less and resistant ≥0.5; other staphylococci, susceptible 0.5 or less and resistant ≥1) |
| Cefoxitin disk diffusion | Cefoxitin induces mecA more strongly and gives a clearer endpoint than oxacillin | Valid for S. aureus and S. lugdunensis (read 16-18 h) and for S. epidermidis and other coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (read 24 h); S. pseudintermedius, S. schleiferi, and S. coagulans fall outside its validation and need species-specific oxacillin testing. No intermediate category exists |
| Cefoxitin MIC | Same induction principle in dilution | CLSI criteria exist only for S. aureus and S. lugdunensis. No breakpoint exists for other CoNS, so do not assign them a cefoxitin MIC category |
| Oxacillin salt-agar screen | MHA + 4% NaCl + 6 µg/mL oxacillin, read at 24 h by transmitted light | A current alternative screen whose validation covers the S. aureus complex only |
| PBP2a latex or lateral-flow immunoassay | Detects the protein directly | Rapid confirmation on a colony; some assays require induction for weak expression, and older reagents may not detect mecC-encoded PBP2c |
| Chromogenic selective media | Select MRSA and differentiate by colony color | Surveillance and screening cultures |
| Molecular (mecA PCR) | Detects the gene | Reference confirmation. mecA-targeted assays miss mecC. Junction-only SCCmec assays can report positive on "empty" cassettes that have lost mecA, a documented false-positive source. An unresolvable genotype-phenotype conflict in S. aureus is reported as resistant |
Some isolates carry mecA but test oxacillin-susceptible (OS-MRSA). The resistant genotype takes precedence when the phenotype looks susceptible. A susceptible phenotype from a serious infection needs molecular confirmation before it is reported.6,7
Pneumococcal and streptococcal resistance
Pneumococcal β-lactam resistance comes from mosaic pbp2x, pbp2b, and pbp1a genes. Pneumococci do not produce β-lactamase, so β-lactamase testing is not performed. The 1-µg oxacillin disk screens non-meningitis isolates: a zone of at least 20 mm predicts penicillin susceptibility and requires no further penicillin testing. A zone of 19 mm or less requires a penicillin MIC, because the screen cannot separate susceptible from intermediate or resistant within that range. CSF isolates skip the screen and go directly to MIC testing of penicillin and the third-generation cephalosporins with meningitis breakpoints. Meningitis, non-meningitis, and oral penicillin breakpoints are three separate sets, and an amoxicillin or ceftriaxone MIC cannot substitute for the penicillin result.1
Inducible clindamycin resistance appears when an isolate tests erythromycin-resistant and clindamycin-susceptible or intermediate. The usual cause is an erm gene (macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B, MLSB) whose methylase is weakly induced by clindamycin but strongly induced by erythromycin. Therapy with clindamycin can then select for expression and fail. The D-zone test places a 15-µg erythromycin disk 15 to 26 mm edge to edge from a 2-µg clindamycin disk (12 mm apart for streptococci and pneumococci on blood agar). Flattening of the clindamycin zone toward the erythromycin disk, or hazy growth within it, is positive. Report the isolate clindamycin-resistant. A negative D-zone in an erythromycin-resistant, clindamycin-susceptible isolate means inducible clindamycin resistance was not detected. When testing is valid, report the clindamycin-susceptible result. A negative D-zone does not identify the cause of erythromycin resistance or guarantee clinical efficacy. The msr family belongs to the antibiotic-resistance ABC-F proteins associated with ribosomal protection. Membrane efflux, its older description, has not been demonstrated. msr(A) in staphylococci is one of these ABC-F proteins. mef(A) encodes a true major-facilitator-superfamily macrolide efflux pump.21,25 A broth microdilution alternative exists for automated panels. When a group B Streptococcus isolate from a pregnant patient is sent for susceptibility testing because of a high-risk penicillin allergy, the laboratory tests clindamycin and erythromycin and performs the D-zone test on any erythromycin-resistant, clindamycin-susceptible (ERY-R/CLI-S) isolate.1
Group A streptococci remain penicillin-susceptible. Macrolide resistance occurs, so the macrolide result is needed when a penicillin allergy requires an alternative agent.
Enterococcus
- Penicillin and ampicillin. In a β-lactamase-negative enterococcus, penicillin susceptibility predicts ampicillin susceptibility. Ampicillin susceptibility does not predict penicillin susceptibility, so test penicillin when its result is needed. Most resistance, chiefly in E. faecium, comes from low-affinity PBP5. β-lactamase production is rare, inoculum-dependent, and missed by routine MIC methods, so CLSI recommends direct nitrocefin testing for selected blood or CSF isolates only.
- High-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR). Aminoglycosides alone are clinically inactive against enterococci. They are tested only for synergy with a cell-wall-active agent. Screening uses 500 µg/mL gentamicin or 1,000 µg/mL streptomycin in broth (2,000 µg/mL streptomycin on agar), or 120-µg gentamicin and 300-µg streptomycin disks. Disk zones of 7 to 9 mm are inconclusive and require dilution confirmation. Gentamicin results do not predict streptomycin, so each is tested separately. A resistant result means that aminoglycoside will not give synergistic bactericidal activity with a cell-wall-active agent. Incubate streptomycin broth tests a full 48 hours. A susceptible result at 24 hours must be reread after continued incubation.1
- Vancomycin resistance. Intrinsic low-level resistance from vanC (D-Ala-D-Ser) occurs in E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus/ E. flavescens. Infection-prevention measures for isolates with intrinsic vanC resistance follow institutional policy.22 Acquired high-level resistance comes chiefly from vanA (D-Ala-D-Lac; resistant to vancomycin and teicoplanin, though teicoplanin is not marketed in the United States) or vanB (variable vancomycin resistance). Substitution of D-Ala-D-Lac lowers vancomycin binding affinity roughly 1,000-fold. Screening uses brain heart infusion (BHI) agar with 6 µg/mL vancomycin, read at a full 24 hours. Disk diffusion zones for vancomycin are also read at 24 hours with transmitted light, because a faint haze inside the zone indicates resistance and cannot be seen with direct light. Motility and pigment support species identification. They do not detect vanC or establish whether additional acquired resistance genes are present. Validated vanA/vanB assays detect those specific genes and may be used for direct rectal screening.1
Vancomycin-intermediate and -resistant S. aureus
Vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA; MIC 4 to 8 µg/mL) arises from progressive cell-wall thickening through mutations in several genes, including the vraTSR, graSR, and walKR regulators and rpoB.27 It is missed by methods that only report categories. VRSA (MIC ≥16 µg/mL) comes from acquisition of the enterococcal vanA operon. All US VRSA isolates have also been MRSA. Vancomycin disk diffusion is not a reliable screen for either. The BHI 6-µg/mL vancomycin screen agar reliably detects MICs of 8 and misses some MICs of 4, so a negative screen does not exclude VISA. Save any S. aureus with a vancomycin MIC of 8 µg/mL or higher and refer it to the state public health laboratory and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) after purity checks and a repeat MIC. Save and refer a confirmed VISA as well. Repeat and confirm a vancomycin MIC of 4 µg/mL. A vancomycin MIC that creeps upward within the susceptible range can reflect heterogeneous intermediate strains, which routine testing does not detect.6,7
Gram-negative β-lactamases: ESBL, AmpC, and carbapenemases
The Ambler scheme sorts β-lactamases structurally into classes A-D. The Bush-Jacoby scheme sorts them functionally by substrate and inhibitor profile.
Scroll sideways to see all columns
| Category | Ambler class | Representative enzymes | Distinguishing behavior | Typically found in |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) | A (serine) | CTX-M (especially CTX-M-15), TEM, SHV | Hydrolyze penicillins, many oxyimino cephalosporins, and aztreonam; spare cephamycins and carbapenems; inhibited by clavulanate | Enterobacterales, especially E. coli, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca |
| AmpC | C (serine) | Chromosomal AmpC; plasmid CMY, DHA, ACT, FOX, MIR, MOX, ACC | Hydrolyze cephamycins and oxyimino cephalosporins; resist clavulanate; inhibited by boronic acid and cloxacillin | Enterobacter cloacae complex, Klebsiella aerogenes (formerly Enterobacter aerogenes), Citrobacter freundii complex (chromosomal); E. coli, Salmonella, and Klebsiella (plasmid) |
| Class A carbapenemase | A (serine) | KPC, SME, IMI | Hydrolyze carbapenems and most β-lactams; inhibited by avibactam and boronic acid | K. pneumoniae, E. coli; SME chromosomal in S. marcescens |
| Class B carbapenemase (metallo-β-lactamase) | B (zinc-dependent) | NDM, VIM, IMP | Strong carbapenem hydrolysis; aztreonam spared; inhibited by EDTA and dipicolinic acid, which chelate the zinc the enzyme depends on; serine β-lactamase inhibitors have no effect | Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, P. aeruginosa |
| Class D carbapenemase, OXA-48-like | D (serine) | OXA-48, OXA-181, OXA-232 | Weak carbapenem hydrolysis, often with retained expanded-spectrum cephalosporin susceptibility; inhibited by avibactam, so ceftazidime-avibactam is usually active | Enterobacterales |
| Class D carbapenemase, Acinetobacter-associated | D (serine) | OXA-23, OXA-24/40, OXA-58, and overexpressed intrinsic OXA-51-like | Carbapenem hydrolysis that drives carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii; not reliably inhibited by avibactam; inhibited by durlobactam, the basis of sulbactam-durlobactam | A. baumannii complex |
This lesson concentrates on ESBL-producing Enterobacterales. ESBL names an enzyme phenotype, and ESBLs also occur in other gram-negative organisms such as P. aeruginosa. The TEM-1 and ROB-1 penicillinases of H. influenzae and N. gonorrhoeae are narrow-spectrum enzymes and are not ESBLs. OXA-48-like enzymes and metallo-β-lactamases spare aztreonam, but the isolates that carry them are often aztreonam-resistant. Co-produced ESBLs or AmpC commonly hydrolyze aztreonam, and NDM-producing isolates in particular are usually aztreonam-resistant through co-produced enzymes. Some European algorithms use temocillin resistance as a marker for OXA-48. Temocillin is not marketed in the United States and has no CLSI breakpoint. In US laboratories, carbapenem nonsusceptibility with retained cephalosporin susceptibility suggests OXA-48-like, SME, or IMI and needs confirmatory testing.19
ESBL screening and confirmatory testing, when performed, uses the clavulanate synergy test: a three or more doubling-dilution MIC decrease, or a 5-mm or greater zone increase, when cefotaxime or ceftazidime is combined with clavulanate confirms ESBL production. CLSI validates the test only for K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, E. coli, and P. mirabilis. Co-produced AmpC can mask ESBL and cause a false-negative confirmatory result, so a negative test does not exclude an ESBL when an AmpC is plausible. Since CLSI lowered the Enterobacterales cephalosporin breakpoints in 2010 (M100-S20), a confirmed ESBL no longer requires editing any cephalosporin or aztreonam result to resistant. The current breakpoints account for ESBLs, and results are reported as tested. The confirmatory test is now used mainly for epidemiology and infection control.1
AmpC reporting separates intrinsic resistance from the risk of AmpC derepression. The chromosomal-AmpC organisms (E. cloacae complex, K. aerogenes, C. freundii complex, and Hafnia alvei, the moderate-risk group under current Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidance, with limited clinical data behind the H. alvei placement; also Morganella, Providencia, and Serratia at lower clinical risk) are intrinsically resistant to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, first-generation cephalosporins, and, except for Morganella and Providencia, ampicillin-sulbactam and cephamycins, so suppress those results or report them resistant. CLSI does not list intrinsic resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, cefepime, aztreonam, or carbapenems for these organisms, because resistance to them depends on derepression that is not present in every isolate. Report a susceptible third-generation cephalosporin result as tested. Derepression can emerge during therapy. That risk, roughly 20% for invasive infection with the moderate-risk group, is communicated to clinicians as a treatment consideration. No CLSI-endorsed or FDA-cleared phenotypic AmpC confirmatory test exists. Inhibitor-based panels are used for research and epidemiology and are not used to release patient results.1,19
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are Enterobacterales resistant to at least one carbapenem (with imipenem-only resistance discounted for Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella, whose intrinsic PBP behavior mimics it) or producing a carbapenemase. Carbapenemase-producing CRE (CP-CRE) are the subset with a detected enzyme. Non-CP CRE typically combine an ESBL or AmpC with porin loss. Carbapenemase detection matters both for infection control and for treatment, since the enzyme type guides agent choice. M100 recommends carbapenemase typing of CRE isolates to support treatment as well as infection control.
Scroll sideways to see all columns
| Test | Principle | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Modified Hodge test | Growth of a susceptible indicator toward a carbapenem disk, distorted by carbapenemase from the test isolate | Obsolete; CLSI removed it as unreliable. False negatives were common with NDM producers, and AmpC-plus-porin mechanisms gave false positives. Zinc-supplemented variants were never validated. Do not use the test |
| Carba NP | Colorimetric detection of imipenem hydrolysis by pH shift | CLSI-recognized rapid test; insensitive for OXA-48-like and chromosomal enzymes and poor with mucoid isolates |
| Modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) | A meropenem disk incubated with the test isolate, then placed on a lawn of susceptible E. coli | CLSI-endorsed for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa; requires overnight incubation; does not type the enzyme. A zone of 6-15 mm is positive |
| EDTA-carbapenem inactivation method (eCIM) | Same procedure with EDTA, performed only on mCIM-positive Enterobacterales | A 5-mm or greater zone increase versus mCIM indicates a metallo-β-lactamase; its validation is limited to Enterobacterales. Co-produced enzymes can make it inconclusive |
| Inhibitor-based combination disks | Differential inhibition by boronic acid (class A) or EDTA (class B) | Gives a provisional phenotypic class that requires confirmation |
| Molecular (PCR) | Direct detection of specific genes (KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, OXA-48-like) | Fast; does not confirm expression; panels miss genes outside their design |
| Lateral-flow immunoassays | Antigen detection of specific carbapenemase families | Discriminates among major families within minutes from a colony |
Haemophilus, Neisseria, and screening
A positive nitrocefin test in H. influenzae predicts ampicillin and amoxicillin resistance. A negative test does not establish ampicillin susceptibility. BLNAR strains have altered PBPs (ftsI mutations) and test ampicillin-resistant on AST. BLNAR isolates are reported resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanate, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefaclor, cefamandole, cefetamet, cefonicid, cefprozil, cefuroxime, loracarbef, and piperacillin-tazobactam despite apparent in vitro susceptibility, because those agents depend on the PBPs the mutations alter. β-lactamase-positive, amoxicillin-clavulanate-resistant (BLPACR) strains have both mechanisms.
Neisseria meningitidis penicillin nonsusceptibility is chiefly PBP-mediated. β-Lactamase is rare. Perform all manipulation of N. meningitidis cultures, including AST, in a biological safety cabinet under enhanced biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) conditions, because laboratory-acquired meningococcal disease has a case fatality rate near 50% and nearly every reported case involved open-bench work. CLSI provides MIC and selected disk methods on blood-supplemented media. For N. gonorrhoeae, the reference method is agar dilution on GC agar base with 1% supplement. Broth dilution is not used. Ceftriaxone and cefixime disk breakpoints have been removed pending review, so MIC testing is required for cephalosporin results. Culture with susceptibility testing is indicated after apparent treatment failure, because NAAT cannot provide AST results.1,20
Scroll sideways to see all columns
| Target organism | Screening specimen | Typical method |
|---|---|---|
| MRSA colonization | Anterior nares; supplementary wound, axilla, or groin swabs in higher-risk settings | Chromogenic selective agar for routine screening; nasal NAAT when same-day turnaround is needed, for example before surgery or ICU admission |
| Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus | Rectal or perirectal swab, or stool | Vancomycin-containing or chromogenic selective agar; vanA/vanB NAAT for rapid turnaround |
| ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales | Rectal or perirectal swab | Chromogenic selective agar containing a marker cephalosporin or carbapenem; multiplex NAAT validated for direct rectal use for rapid turnaround |
Chromogenic culture costs less, detects any resistant organism regardless of mechanism, and confirms viable colonization, but requires overnight incubation. NAAT gives same-day results and identifies the gene, but misses mechanisms outside its panel. A positive gene result from a swab documents carriage. It is used for infection-control decisions and is not a susceptibility result for the patient. Programs commonly use culture for routine surveillance and reserve NAAT for outbreaks and high-acuity admissions.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis molecular resistance detection and susceptibility testing are covered in mycobacteriology. At the bench, check the organism, the specimen source, the method, and the breakpoint version before you report any interpretive category.
Practice
References
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 36th ed. CLSI supplement M100. CLSI; 2026, including the July 9, 2026 Table 2H-1 correction. Numeric interpretive tables are proprietary; the correction notice is published at clsi.org. Back to text
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Breakpoint implementation toolkit. Accessed August 31, 2026. https://clsi.org/resources/breakpoint-implementation-toolkit/ Back to text
- US Food and Drug Administration. Antibacterial susceptibility test interpretive criteria. Accessed August 31, 2026. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-resources/antibacterial-susceptibility-test-interpretive-criteria Back to text
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M02, Disk Diffusion 14th ed. and M07, Dilution 12th ed. CLSI; 2024. Back to text
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Laboratory assessment of antibiotic resistance testing capacity: Mueller-Hinton medium specifications. Accessed August 31, 2026. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/103871 Back to text
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Laboratory testing for methicillin (oxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Reviewed June 27, 2025. Accessed August 31, 2026. https://www.cdc.gov/mrsa/php/laboratories/index.html Back to text
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Laboratory testing for vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Reviewed April 15, 2024. Accessed August 31, 2026. https://www.cdc.gov/staphylococcus-aureus/php/laboratories/index.html Back to text
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Re-exploring the intermediate interpretive category. Accessed August 31, 2026. https://clsi.org/resources/insights-blog/re-exploring-the-intermediate-interpretive-category/ Back to text
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. MR01, Polymyxin Breakpoints for Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. 2nd ed. CLSI; 2020. Accessed August 31, 2026. https://clsi.org/shop/standards/mr01/ Back to text
- US Food and Drug Administration. FDA rationale for the recognition decision: daptomycin. Accessed August 31, 2026. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-resources/fda-rationale-recognition-decision-daptomycin-0 Back to text
- Jorgensen JH, Crawford SA. Assessment of two commercial susceptibility test methods for determination of daptomycin MICs. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(6):2126-2129. doi:10.1128/JCM.00076-06 Back to text
- Deventer AT, Stevens CE, Stewart A, Hobbs JK. Antibiotic tolerance among clinical isolates: mechanisms, detection, prevalence, and significance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024;37(4):e00106-24. Back to text
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M52, Verification of Commercial Microbiological Systems. CLSI; 2015 (reaffirmed 2020). Accessed August 31, 2026. https://clsi.org/shop/standards/m52/ Back to text
- Code of Federal Regulations. 42 CFR §493.1261: routine susceptibility testing controls. Accessed August 31, 2026. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/493.1261 Back to text
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. FAQs for Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP). Accessed August 31, 2026. https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/legislation/clia/downloads/faqs-iqcp.pdf Back to text
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M11, Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria. 9th ed. CLSI; 2018 (reaffirmed 2025). Back to text
- Kallen AJ, Thompson L, Lonsaway G, et al. Complete restriction of fluoroquinolone use to control an outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection at a community hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(3):264-272. Dingle KE, Didelot X, Quill TE, et al. Effects of control measures on vancomycin-resistant enterococci and ribotype 027 Clostridium difficile in England: a modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(8):782-791. Back to text
- Simner PJ, Hindler JA, Bhowmick T, et al. What's new in antibiograms? Updating CLSI M39 guidance with current trends. J Clin Microbiol. 2022;60(10):e02210-21. doi:10.1128/jcm.02210-21 Table 1 and discussion of M39, 5th edition. Back to text
- Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2026 guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant gram-negative infections. Accessed August 31, 2026. https://www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/ Back to text
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fatal meningococcal disease in a laboratory worker: California, 2012. MMWR. 2014;63(35):770-772. Accessed August 31, 2026. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6335a2.htm Back to text
- Sharkey LKR, Edwards TA, O'Neill AJ. ABC-F proteins mediate antibiotic resistance through ribosomal protection. mBio. 2016;7(2):e01975-15. doi:10.1128/mBio.01975-15. Abstract and introduction; direct biochemical experiments used Vga(A) and Lsa(A). Back to text
- Britt NS, Potter EM. Clinical epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus gallinarum and Enterococcus casseliflavus bloodstream infections. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2016;5:57-61. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2015.12.002. Introduction and methods: intrinsic vanC background and limits of phenotype-based genotype inference. Back to text
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100, 30th ed., combined corrections. September 14, 2020. Page 3, February 6 correction to Table 2C: species-specific cefoxitin disk-diffusion reading times, including the corrected 24-hour period for S. epidermidis. Accessed September 8, 2026. https://clsi.org/media/3824/m100ed30_combined_correction_notice_20200914_web.pdf Back to text
- Huse H, Bowden R, Uprety P. A clinical case of Burkholderia cepacia complex and changes to CLSI antimicrobial susceptibility testing recommendations. CLSI AST News Update. 2025;11(November). Documents removal of disk diffusion breakpoints for the complex in 2024 (M100 34th ed.) and MIC breakpoints in 2025 (M100 35th ed.), the recommendation against routine AST, and the Table 2B-3 statement that frozen reference broth microdilution is the only reproducible method if testing is performed. Accessed September 11, 2026. https://clsi.org/media/kzhkeain/ast_newsletterfall25_web.pdf Back to text
- Feßler AT, Wang Y, Wu C, Schwarz S. Mobile macrolide resistance genes in staphylococci. Plasmid. 2019;99:2-10. doi:10.1016/j.plasmid.2018.05.001 Abstract: msr(A) codes for an ABC-F protein conferring macrolide and streptogramin B resistance, while mef(A) codes for a major facilitator superfamily efflux protein exporting only macrolides. Accessed September 11, 2026. Back to text
- European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for bacteria and mycoses, v 16.1, valid from 2026-06-24, and the guidance document EUCAST breakpoints in brackets (December 2021). Colistin MIC breakpoints in brackets for Enterobacterales (S 2 or less, R>2 mg/L), Pseudomonas spp. (S 4 or less, R>4), and Acinetobacter spp. (S 2 or less, R>2), with reporting of susceptible discouraged without a comment on adjunctive measures. Accessed September 11, 2026. https://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints Back to text
- Hu Q, Peng H, Rao X. Molecular events for promotion of vancomycin resistance in vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1601. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01601 Back to text